It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Number23
I'm not going to go to the trouble of quoting all of Stellar's nonsense and Marxist blather. So let's look at some actual data. (I know, an unusual thing around here)
The federal budget estimate for the fiscal year just completed dropped to $250 billion, congressional estimators said Friday, as the economy continues to fuel impressive tax revenues.
The Congressional Budget Office's latest estimate is $10 billion below CBO predictions issued in August and well below a July White House prediction of $296 billion.
The improving deficit picture _ Bush predicted a $423 billion deficit in his February budget _ has been driven by better-than-expected tax receipts, especially from corporate profits, CBO said.
www.breitbart.com...
There is an editorial in today's Wall St. Journal about the "tax tidal wave" due to Bush's tax cuts. Thanks to said tax cuts and pro-growth policies, the America's economy has growth more thant TWENTY PERCENT in the last four years.
That's TWO TRILLION DOLLARS equal to China's GDP. That's right, in the last for years America's grown a Chinese economy.
Additionally, the deficit is running at less than 2% of GDP. Can anyone name another industrial economy who's deficit is 2% or less? AND America's debt burden is less than EU zone and just about every other industrial economy.
Originally posted by Number23
Fiat money is a very unintuitive and complex notion and I won't attempt to go into details here.
There's been plenty written on the subject by people far smarter than I. Your post indicates a rather unsophisticated understating of the subject and would encourage you to do some research.
The premise that gold standard = good and fiat money = bad is simplistic and wrong.
If one is to grow an economy, a growing money supply is required. This is difficult to accomplish without fiat money and absent growth in the money supply, deflation results.
Most serious economist consider species money an significant contributer to the global economic crash of the 1930s
Any time you establish rules to govern a system, winners and losers will result.
Fiat and species money both have their own set of winners and losers. It's just the ratio of winners to losers if far more favorable for fiat money.