It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by JIMC5499
All of this took place in about 20 minutes elapsed time. The video had a time counter visable. I think the show was "Amazing Videos" or something like it.
Originally posted by Aim64C
Wood fires reach temperatures capable of melting steel. That's HISTORY.
The change in the color is no real indication of whether or not there is fuel still present in the building. The fuel-air mixture is affected by many things - especially other fires as well as the rising heat which can cause a draft, increasing the available oxygen supply.
Originally posted by bsbray11
When heat is trapped, enclosed in an area, hydrocarbon fires can produce temperatures above their approximate 825 C open-atmosphere limit. It also sounds as though there was more than enough fuel, from start to finish. Neither of those applied to the Twin Tower fires.
Also take into account that a steel girder is not a very good representation of the structure of a 110-story skyscraper. Even if parts of floors failed from fire, which I doubt given the nature of the WTC fires, then there still should not have been any failures of whole floors because of localized damage. The impacts are proof of that. Unless the fires managed to take out the majority of any given floor's supports, a collapse simply would not have started.
Originally posted by Aim64C
And what is a furnace? Does one have to be manufactured in order to accomplish the same overall objective? What similarities does the structure of the WTC have in common with that of a furnace?
What about those said additives being completely consumed, leaving only the jet fuel, causing the change in smoke color?
What other combustables are in the world trade center other than wood?
Originally posted by bsbray11
See if you can find some sort of link or video to the information, so we have something more than hearsay to go off of.