It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Springer
Man that is NOT a name worthy of ANY credibility with me. Wow, do some research into Dave Gaubatz and go from there...
To think the Old Money wouldn't male a sacrificial lamb of Galloway (not saying they DID but) is such a naive thought that I have to wonder if those who think it have ANY IDEA what the Federal Reserve, the single MOST powerful financial entity on this planet, is?
Do you think it's Government owned institution?
I look forward to the answer to this one, simple, question...
Springer...
Originally posted by marg6043
Is very interesting to see, when a very outspoken known figure like Mr. Galloway becomes too dangerous to be an attempt on his life to silence him, the next option is to get his credibility attacked with propaganda.
It is so calculated and obvious that we should not question the credibility of Mr. Galloway but should get deeper into the motives and the comments about the connection.
The question should be who make the connection and why.
Originally posted by War_Monger
Marg
Did I miss something here? How is this propaganda. How do you know the suspect's sister didn't say this? How do you know the suspect didn't meet Galloway?
Originally posted by neformore
You missed a whole lot. Did you read the article?
Its propaganda because its an indirect slur. It may actually be totally false but it was printed in a Newspaper and even included its own disclaimer but some of the people who read it will believe it, whether its true or false.
Its the same line as Bush took when he tried to link Al-Quaeda to Saddam Hussein, and with the whole Iraq/WMD thing. Repat something often enough and people start believing it whether its true or not.
As for my point earlier about Rumsfeld, there is documented video evidence of Rumsfeld shaking Saddam Husseins hand and being warmly greeted by the former dictator. Therefore, by some of the "logic" people use Rumsfeld deals with dictators and terrorists and should be "fried" for it.
There is a thin line between fact and propaganda. Things are written deliberatley so that they can can be misread or interpreted in a number of ways.
A spokesman for MP Galloway, above, said: “Waheed Zaman is not a name that George is familiar with. He is not known to him on a personal level.” There is no suggestion Galloway is an associate of Zaman.
A spokesman for MP Galloway, above, said: “Waheed Zaman is not a name that George is familiar with. He is not known to him on a personal level.” There is no suggestion Galloway is an associate of Zaman.
Originally posted by WestPoint23
Yeah whatever, without even think about it twice or looking into people are automatically willing to blame the "government" because they’re behind it all. It cant be a news source trying to gain headlines and viewers, no it’s the government, like they would give a… abut George Galloway now. Nothing but blind suspicion from both sides, sad.
[edit on 11-8-2006 by WestPoint23]
Originally posted by War_Monger
Are we talking about the same article here? Of course I read it. I read it before I saw it posted on ATS. I originally read it on Drudge and was thinking about posting it earlier in the day...before someone else decided to. However, I do have to ask if you read the entire article? You may want to read it again. Here, I'll even help you:
A spokesman for MP Galloway, above, said: “Waheed Zaman is not a name that George is familiar with. He is not known to him on a personal level.” There is no suggestion Galloway is an associate of Zaman.
Originally posted by War_Monger
I was waiting to see how long it would take someone to drag Bush and/or Blair into this but you went beyond the beyond and had to include Rumsfled who has nothing to do with this article...just as Bush and Blair have nothing to do with it. Your liberal left wing bias and bigotry is blinding!
Originally posted by War_Monger
Your liberal left wing bias and bigotry is blinding!
Originally posted by neformore
Originally posted by War_Monger
Your liberal left wing bias and bigotry is blinding!
This is particularly insulting.
Show me where I am
- Left wing
- Bias
- A bigot.
Quote me. Put up or shut up. If you can't do it, post a retraction.
Its the same line as Bush took when he tried to link Al-Quaeda to Saddam Hussein, and with the whole Iraq/WMD thing. Repat something often enough and people start believing it whether its true or not.
As for my point earlier about Rumsfeld, there is documented video evidence of Rumsfeld shaking Saddam Husseins hand and being warmly greeted by the former dictator. Therefore, by some of the "logic" people use Rumsfeld deals with dictators and terrorists and should be "fried" for it.
Originally posted by War_Monger
And I'm insulted by the incessant claim that Bush lied.
I'm also insulted by your wish to see the United States Secretary of Defense executed.
As for my point earlier about Rumsfeld, there is documented video evidence of Rumsfeld shaking Saddam Husseins hand and being warmly greeted by the former dictator. Therefore, by some of the "logic" people use Rumsfeld deals with dictators and terrorists and should be "fried" for it.
If in fact Galloway is involved.........he should fry...........
Bush and Rumsfeld had nothing to do with this topic until Bush/Rumsfeld haters brought it up.
When you retract your anti Bush rhetoric and your wish to see Rumsfeld executed (fried) I will retract calling you a biased left wing bigot.
Originally posted by stumason
Funny, I thought "leftist's" were against the death penalty, so I don't see how this particular label applies.
Also, Bush did lie...About alot of things. That is common knowledge. So did Blair. In fact, I thought everyone knew ALL politicians lied?
Why get your knickers in a twist over it?
Maybe he lied, maybe he didn't
I'm sure he believed what he was told by certain sections of his staff. He sure as hell didn't believe the sections that told him that there was no connection, and kept repeating his belief that there were. Just to add though - the 9/11 commision also found no links, as shown here
quote: As for my point earlier about Rumsfeld, there is documented video evidence of Rumsfeld shaking Saddam Husseins hand and being warmly greeted by the former dictator. Therefore, by some of the "logic" people use Rumsfeld deals with dictators and terrorists and should be "fried" for it.
Originally posted by stumason
Hang the lot of 'em I say. MP's/Congress persons, whatever, should be chosen by random lottery, but thats another thread.
Me, I don't care much for labelling, which is why I posted originally. Labels put people into brackets, when each person has their own views and beliefs. To label someone is to play the old divide and conquer game.
Everyone is different, remember that.
Just because someone doesn't agree with you, does not automatically make them a liberal/neo-con/war perv of lefty commie pinko peadophile, or whatever.
You said you get called "partisan", just remember labelling goes both ways.
paraphrase: The Federal Reserve is a 100% private institution, owned by the old money families...