It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Nygdan
So IF the history were as clear cut as in your hypothesis, it'd have a stronger base, but I don't think it is as broad a division as you're speculating, and that undercuts the explanation you are using, imo.
Originally posted by Kamran
I'm afraid but you cannot attibute to only these three religions War Mongers.
Other religions have also caused killings, murders, massacres.
Other religions promote Good and Evil too... Hinduism you stated, it has 'Good Gods' and 'Evil Gods'. Even some pagan religions used to sacrifice people!
A life lost is a life lost - One or more, does it matter?
Originally posted by Sonata
Religion is just the tip of an even bigger form of understanding of our envirnment. You just need to look beyound your own ideals to understand the truth of everything. Its right in front of your face but perceptually not comprehendable to you just yet.
A scary way for you to precieve it would be to throw away everything you have ever read and make your own self discoveries. Only through your senses can you even begin to comprehinsably grasp what the universe is truly capable of and beyound that what its true purpose is. There is more than meets the eye. A star is much more than swirling gas especially the big white ones.
Originally posted by St Udio
Kachina,
there is another way to look at 'semites' & why a few someones would have a deep, even primal bias against them.
i may be a bit loose with the academic indentification of who constitute the
group of different peoples that make up 'semites', but they are linked to one
another in language roots.
These various groups, tribes, peoples ranged from N Africa to the BlackSea.
Semites are generally thought to have been nomads & pastorialists, like in
herding goats, sheep, livestock...but some were not.
Here's the premise...my ancestors were from a "clan-of-the-cave-bear" stock.
Other people had their ancient society & economy revolving around a "pack" world-view. Still other groups were centralized on maybe agriculture or fishing...etc...
In either of the 3 examples given above, the lifestyle and course of daily life & survival had absolutely nothing to do with herding flocks of livestock like the 'semites' built a culture around.
A present day observer, researcher, just might be able to make a case that
in any groups deep psyche subconscious...
such as descendants of cave-bear-clan would have disgust, suspicion, waryness, of descendants from a nomadic-goatherder-clan...as each unique clan memory held different gods-seasons-territories and social interactions etc.,
as important or vital to their culture, alone.
in a way, the global village of the 20-21st centuries, is having our collective noses
rubbed by all the semetic groups...as the 'desert religions' are commanding center stage in all aspects of the modern world. We live in a world where the semites monotheist g-d is the standard for everyone to follow, and world events
whether positive or negative, are just fallout from the eternal conflict between the semites themselves as they 'look down' on the rest of us.
DNA? genetic memory?
is that the fragmented, obscure connection that sometimes becomes a cyclic period of anti-semitism?
Originally posted by runetang
lol.
Semitic, and anti-semitic, comes from the term SHEM.
SHEM was one of the 3 fathers of modern mankind, Noah's 3 sons that accompanied him on the Ark, along with JAPHETH and HAM. SHEM was father of the Jews and Arabs, Ham the Egyptians and Africans, and Japheth the "Gentiles", Greeks, and Barbarians, commonly known as white people.
anti-SHEMitic sounds stupid like you have a lisp so they abbreviated it.
P.S. - You're probably asking yourself "Well who is the Patriarch of the Asians then?". The answer is simple, asians didn't exist in the ancient times! At least to the people writing those texts.. they knew nothing about them whatsoever, and it shows.
[edit on 14-9-2006 by runetang]
You my friend, poster of this thread, are anti-Abrahamic. and thats downright evil, nice job
Originally posted by Kachina
Originally posted by Kamran
I'm afraid but you cannot attibute to only these three religions War Mongers.
Other religions have also caused killings, murders, massacres.
Other religions promote Good and Evil too... Hinduism you stated, it has 'Good Gods' and 'Evil Gods'. Even some pagan religions used to sacrifice people!
A life lost is a life lost - One or more, does it matter?
Name all the countries the Hindus have invaded since the Vedas were distributed to the masses.
Please let us not introduce absurdities to this conversation.
Originally posted by demorior
To say that Christianity, Islam and Judism are warmongers isnt really fair, or justified. True, some people have used these as excuses for wars and many very bad actions, but does that mean that the religion should be blamed for something? I could strap C4 to myself and run into a building and declare that I'm going to distroy it in the name of Gaia, does that mean that Gaian's (is that the right name?) are a violent religion? Christianity clearly teaches peace and going back to the original Christian's willingness to die rather than rebel against Rome, its clear Christianity is ment to be of peace. Judism has had a violent past, but only when they were very clearly commanded to by God...
The script or scripture the Trinity of Conflict follow does not have any Goddess representation.
Originally posted by 3ftcrow
The few people with the most power have done everything they could to stop Change from occuring. And they've been very successful for a while now. But Change is like water, it can only be held back for so long before it bursts/overflows the dam holding it back. When that happens all who stand in its way will be swept before it. "
Everything Changes, its only a matter of time. The only questions are: When?
Where? How?