posted on Oct, 30 2003 @ 06:43 AM
(1) Can *fundamental* properties of substances be changed by external artificial means?
Part of my thesis as a grad student in chemical engineering was predicting the temperature profile of a rod with convective & radiative losses. One
end was embedded in a furnace and the rest was exposed to the air. My model was subsequently used by another grad student whose project was to verify
that the thermal conductivity of the metal (rod) could be changed by applying ultrasonics to it. (I suspect this would facilitate improvements in
some manufacturing process of the company that was sponsoring the research grant.) They already qualitatively knew this happened but needed to
quantify and tabulate the results.
Along the same lines, I seem to recall reading that certain EM fields could even change the decay rate of a radioactive substance. If that is true,
then could it apply to a decay that produced an anti-particle? Artificially increase the decay rate and use the anti-particles immediately in an
annihilation reaction to generate heat/energy (i.e., better than a battery or fuel cell; a pseudo "Element-115"?).
What other so-called "fundamental" properties can be changed/altered via external means?
(2) Although we err by being human and are quick to criticize things we don't understand, it appears there was a sound "method to their madness" of
the scientists, politicians, military planners and engineers involved in the Manhattan Project. Check out Carey Sublette's detailed "Chronology of
Nuclear Weapons" at
www.stealthskater.com... .