posted on Jul, 28 2006 @ 08:26 AM
Originally posted by Vushta
[I wasn't aware the the class being taught was.."The 911 CT."
It isn;t. It is a PART of his class. You and others here are trying to say his syllabus consists mainly of this toipic and this is NOT what was
reported. All that was reported is that he included his opinions of 9/11 (relevvant because it was blamed on Islamics) in A lecture.
Where is your source that it is anything more than the topic of a single day of lecture?
where is your source that it is not a small fraction of the topics covered?
Where is your source that the class being taught was... "The 9/11 CT"?
What does it even matter to you? He is a PROFESSOR who since he is NOT teaching an exact science is PAID to teach partly based on his OPINION. He is
not REQUIRED to be fair or balanced. That is the beauty of University. If the students leave the class thinking he is a nut and demand their money
back then they will get it.
Why is it so important to you to keep anything but the official story out of the teachings of a PUBLIC INSTITUTION of HIGHER LEARNING?