It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Keyhole
It is safer to let Hezbolla do the fighting and get the blame, if Hezbolla wins, great for Lebanon.
If Hezbolla loses, Lebanon had nothing to do with it.
[edit on 20-7-2006 by Keyhole]
somehow sitting back and idly accepting the destruction from the IDF is actually the "best" option.
Originally posted by Slap Nuts
Originally posted by Keyhole
It is safer to let Hezbolla do the fighting and get the blame, if Hezbolla wins, great for Lebanon.
If Hezbolla loses, Lebanon had nothing to do with it.
[edit on 20-7-2006 by Keyhole]
You are good at answering your own question.
They have created a paradox for Isreal...
You cannot attack Lebanon the country because it is Hezbolla attacking you. You are killing innocents.
You cannot allow the attacks coming from Lebanon to continue becaue it is killing innocents..
So, you have to expend 10x the resources rooting out Hezbollah whilst leaving Lebanon intact.
If Texas started lobbing missiles at Mexico... Do you think this would happen? "Damn Texans... nothing we can do about them on our soil so you have no right to attack us you monsters!!!"
Weird, twisted politics.