posted on Jun, 29 2006 @ 11:54 AM
Well, sure, you want to posit the existence of a phantom particle that somehow absorbs the momentum of a free neutron, no matter what the vector, hey,
why not just invent an unknown field that prevents resonance capture? Or one that increases the surface tension of a nucleus? Either of those would
work...or, say, we could invent a new particle that stops the motion of electrons in wires, or maybe changes the Poynting vector! This is fun! You
could also stop fission by reducing the repulsive force of electric charges in the nucleus. Simple! They do it on ST:TNG every week! "Reverse the
polychronon anti-flushback flow polarity to achieve a protonic reversal of the tachyon inverse metaphasic shield, Geordie!" The only sticky part is,
it's bs.
But truthfully, you have to say as a fact that we do know enough to make one go "bang". That implies that at least the basic model is pretty close,
close enough to predict it and have it happen right on schedule. And that model says "no", along with most of the rest of physics. Maybe it's all
wrong, and tomorrow we'll discover it's really all orgones and adelidicnander forces. But I'd say it's about as likely as Joshua ben Nun stopping
the rotation of the earth by the power of thought in order to have time to finish up a battle.