HAARP, research or destruction??

Howdy, I did a search in the forum's for previous posts on HAARP, but to no avail. So I'll start one?

I feel HAARP is one of the greatest scientific advancements we've made in the past 20 years, however Im not too sure on the line between fact and fiction.

For those that do not know what HAARP is, I will BRIEFLY try and explain.

Bernard Eastlund was a phycisist who evidently created a way to transmit high frequency energy anywhere in the world by bouncing radio waves off of the earth's Ionosphere. Once in the Ionosphere, it would heat up, creating a bubble effect which then bounces the energy back down to the projected site. Apparently they can control the trajectories through the use of computers.

The HAARP installation was built in northern Alaska, with plans to transmit the worlds largest supply of natural gas to sub-stations all over the world. Since piping natural gas from Alaska to the rest of the world is nearly impossible, HAARP would be able to burn the natural gas into energy and harness that into a large wave of energy sent up into the ionosphere... then bounced down to the stations and transmitted to their clients. Yay... no more ungodly power bills! Wrong.

The US stepped in, of course... and snatched up the patents and quickly had Eastlund begin working on other applications of HAARP.

Some say death ray's... some say it was for our Star Wars defense program.

What do you guys think? Viewzone has a great intro to HAARP if anyones interested.


www.viewzone.com...

I feel Tesla had the same idea much earlier, unforunately he was a little too shunned to be able to finish his work. Early 1900's vs late 1980's would do that I suppose

Anyhow, would like to hear some of you guys thought's.

Later
Crowley

*deep breath*

www.abovetopsecret.com...
www.abovetopsecret.com...
www.abovetopsecret.com...
www.abovetopsecret.com...
www.abovetopsecret.com...
www.abovetopsecret.com...
www.abovetopsecret.com...
www.abovetopsecret.com...
www.abovetopsecret.com...
www.abovetopsecret.com...
www.abovetopsecret.com...

There are a couple of the HAARP threads 'round here.

-B.

Common Banshee, You only gave him/her the short list? Slipping I tell ya

Originally posted by Fry2
Common Banshee, You only gave him/her the short list?

Slipping I tell ya

Cut me some slack here, Fry! I'll get the pre-August stuff later.




-B.

Thanks for the uhh... enlightenment, there Banshee, you're amazing.

...

I found some, yes... however, there are new members who have probably missed the posts, such as myself. Am I going to sit and filter through # until I find what I'm looking for? No.

A keyword search does not always guarantee you what you are looking for... nor am I looking for a RTFM response.

Thanks anyhow... again, you're amazing.

Originally posted by Crowley
Thanks for the uhh... enlightenment, there Banshee, you're amazing.

...

I found some, yes... however, there are new members who have probably missed the posts, such as myself. Am I going to sit and filter through # until I find what I'm looking for? No.

A keyword search does not always guarantee you what you are looking for... nor am I looking for a RTFM response.

Thanks anyhow... again, you're amazing.

*shrug*
You said you'd searched for previous HAARP posts but to no avail.
And I wouldn't exactly call the posts "#" to filter through.
A RTFM response would've warranted a terse "do a damn search," but I'm a little nicer than that. I can say that the "search" function is there so that new threads aren't started on the same topics, which clutters up the database and gives William a headache when things go wonky.

Your sarcasm is duly noted,
but don't call the existing HAARP threads "#." That's months of research for some of us there, and we're pretty proud of 'em.

-B.

Didnt call them #. I said I didnt want to filter through #.

I did a search and most of the things I found were irrelevant to what I was talking about.

It pulled up many posts where just the word HAARP may have been mentioned. Not an actual post with information about the subject.

Thanks