Originally posted by asala
How possible is this to do?
It's possible, but other agents are more potential biological weapons. The problem with this is that it would be difficult to create large amounts
of it, and even if you did have large amounts of it, it would be hard to disperse among victims; unless it's truly perfected by North Korea.
would a weapon like this really work?
Possibly, after year/s of research.
would this be any more deadly than a normal bomb?
This depends on several things. First, it would depend on whether or not North Korea successfully cultivated large amount of its; by large I mean
tons of it (not tons as in lots, tons as in 2,000 pound tons). That part of it is not that hard to imagine; Biopreparat created multiple tons of
nearly every biological agent during World War II and after, even Ebola. Whether or not this is more deadly a normal bomb relies on several things.
If the flu weakens during the years of testing, then it probably wouldn't be as powerful as a normal bomb. There is also the possibility that the
scientists will enhance that capabilities of the bird flu virus. It's not like this hasn't been done before, either. Biopreparat is also acclaimed
to have combined Ebola and Smallpox; calling it "Blackpox", which also happens to be the name of a particular symptom of smallpox (once you get this
symptom, there is internal bleeding under your skin, and your skin appears charred; at this point, you have a
VERY low chance of surviving.
Now, if they
DID get large amounts of this and they
DID have the proper bombs to release tons of this over a large scale, and they
DID perfect it as an aerosol, and they
DID manage to maintain its unusually high potency rate, then yes, it could be more effective and
deadly than a bomb. One thing that countries enjoy about biological warfare is that it can continue to effect and terrorize the country years after;
spreading from one person to another. On the other hand, nuclear weaponry also can effect people years after impact.
Now, one advantage to biological weapons is that you leave infastructure intact, which can later be taken control of by the country that deployed the
biological weapons; so that
could be another advantage that this would have over average bombs; though in cities like New York, it would
probably be more beneficial to completely decimate it.
In a more general tone; don't fool yourself and think that North Korea is the only country trying to weaponize this. Let's just look at the Ebola
virus again. Several of its "outbreaks" were at biological weapons facilities throughout various countries, one being in the United States. I
wouldn't put it below any country to take this chance to make a weapon out of a potential 90%+ mortality rate.
[edit on 9-5-2006 by Omniscient]
[edit on 9-5-2006 by Omniscient]