48% of s. korean youth would rather help NK

Guess who classes them as terrorist?

"The U.S. Department of State, in its report on international terrorism"

Is this the same US government which proclaimed there were WMDs in iraq?





EDIT

[edit on 27-4-2006 by chinawhite]

Originally posted by MadGreebo
good for them then. Stop maintaining all the bases, stop funding lots of the training, stop training the troops....

and sit and watch the war.
awesome.

...and they can stop paying america protection money so american citizens will be forced to work instead of sitting at home getting fat. This goes the same for Taiwan. Just stop buying ### out of date, second-hand american weaponery at 10 times the marked-up price.

Do NOT circumvent the censors.

Mod Edit: Profanity/Circumvention Of Censors – Please Review This Link.

[edit on 27-4-2006 by mrwupy]

Originally posted by chinawhite
Guess who classes them as terrorist?

"The U.S. Department of State, in its report on international terrorism"

Is this the same US government which proclaimed there were WMDs in iraq?

Erm right, so we'll just disregard all teh instances of NK terrorism such as the SK cabinet bombing, the bombing of a SK airliner, the uncountable incursions across the borders resulting in the death of SK's. Maybe you should actually read something about it before making yourself look foolish.

Well... so we all come to something agreeable to ask: Why are American soldiers still in Korea? The SK military is far from able to hold their own ground without US troops there (correct me if I'm wrong), Koreans don't exactly like the US troops there (especially after the incident of the tank rolling over two Korean school girls), US families would rather see their sons and daughters home rather than abroad, and it would save the US government a lot of money having tens of thousands of troops home rather than being stationed abroad.

So... why is it that so many American soldiers are still stationed in Korea?