It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The Fifth Essence

page: 1
0

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 14 2003 @ 12:20 AM
link   


In his latest book, William Irwin Thompson offers his readers various schema for examining stages of the evolution of human consciousness [Coming Into Being, New York: St. Martin's Press, 1996]. This paper raises some questions about the metaphor through which thinkers may wish to consider the nature of the current stage.

Thompson begins with McLuhan's schema, which identified five stages of human social development, each identified by its medium of communication and therefore the Oral, Script, Alphabetic, Print and Electric stages.

Thompson himself also categorizes five stages of development, cross-indexed against axis of economy, polity, and cohesive association.


Rest of link....

www.mystae.com...

The article provides a unuiqe perspective into Socio-Religious development, this in respect to mankind as a whole.

Any thoughts?



posted on Oct, 14 2003 @ 12:25 AM
link   
man was created with many "gifts" that have nothing to do with these so called developments...

how have we come so far and be so little....



posted on Oct, 14 2003 @ 04:08 AM
link   
From the context of analyzing all major religions, a potential response, is that words have nothing to do with the answers you are looking for.

How is love expressed in concrete terms?

One answer is that God is love.

Consider that from the context of form and substance and taking into consideration, that what is to us an emotion. Is to God, something he can touch in the same way, you can touch your own hand.

From link


The quark is the point manifestation of the quantum chromo dynamic field, the photon is the point manifestation of the electromagnetic field, the graviton is the point manifestation of the gravity field and what we are trying to name here is the point manifestation of the space-time field.


Funny thing is, is there really that big of a difference between what is being said here and what I am presenting in this response? Or is it merely a different perspective of the same thing?

Any thoughts?



 
0

log in

join