The driver DID shoot JFK in the head !!!!!

I could never make out the suposed "driver shoot JFK frames" but after getting a copy of "William Cooper - JFK Assassin Unmasked" there's no doubting the driver shot JFK in the head with some type of handgun. Please, like what are the chances of JFK's head exploding just as that "object" is pointed at him ?

www.abovetopsecret.com...
For this thread, I took some of the colors and did a comparison, I'm fairly convinced the frames in question regarding the driver's turn to face the president were tampered with.

Originally posted by twitchy
I'm fairly convinced the frames in question regarding the driver's turn to face the president were tampered with.

why ?

Is there a probability to increase the pixes on the frame. It is tough to visualise the frame in discussion.

Probably because the driver didn't shoot him and someone wanted to make it look like he did.

So this footage was faked ?




Cause, if the driver did shoot JFK that would make sense of why jackie jumped out the back

Originally posted by helium3

Originally posted by twitchy
I'm fairly convinced the frames in question regarding the driver's turn to face the president were tampered with.

why ?

I discussed the color coding in more detail about half way through this thread, www.abovetopsecret.com...
but basicly the passenger's head is the exact same color and reflectivity as the sidewalk, and I think that a section of the sidewalk was pasted over the driver's gun to mask it. I have done a good deal of both film and video editing, and call it a hunch, but the frames look tampered with to me.

And having her husbands head explode and his brains end up in her lap wouldn't cause her to try to get away from it by jumping out the back of the car?

Originally posted by twitchy
but basicly the passenger's head is the exact same color and reflectivity as the sidewalk, and I think that a section of the sidewalk was pasted over the driver's gun to mask it.

Im just reading your post now, but that is a good point, would the pasting have been done in the 60's ?

I dont believe for 1 second that the driver shot kennedy...not one second.

Do you really think a grainy pic that you cant even make out that you have a to have a colour code for because its so fuzzy is the smoking gun in all this?

what about eye witnesses? there are no credible ones....Jackie has never blamed the driver, and she would have almost certainly seen him do it had he did...no doubt your reply to this willl be they "silenced" her. shes too high profile to put the scares on so that never happend.

a handgun wouldnt cause the damage to a head like that did, its obviously a rifle bullet.

and what about the other shots fired? where they all the driver missing the president from almost point blank? how rubbish a shot was he if it was him??!

this is an utter laughable explanation as to what happend

This is hilarious, I mean, it would have looked even more suspicious if the driver hadn't turned around. Regardless of if the driver was in on it or not, which I believe he was, he's going to turn around and survey the situation. Just my opinion.

It's amazing to me that people continue, to this day, to overlook the possibility that the fatal head shot came from the sewer.:shk:

Peace

[edit on 23-3-2006 by Dr Love]

I don't see it. I don't see a gun. I can barely see the dude's head. Besides, don't you think Jackie might have mentioned the driver shooting JFK at some point? Or maybe the guy next to him? Something like that, I think it would be doubtful that only Zapruder managed to film it, and not notice it, either.

I'm pretty sure Lee Harvey Oswald did it, but I still have a few questions about who he did it FOR. If you buy into all the theories, the Mafia, the CIA, the Cubans, Castro, LBJ, the Russians, and who knows who else were all gunning for the man. Somebody was bound to get him.

I am increasingly thinking that the shot from the repository was a signal for the others to spring into action. Shots could have come across the lawn as per the recent thread with the two guys in it.

The driver could have spun around fast and put one in Kennedy as an assurance shot to make sure it was taken care of.

The shots from the repository were just signals and red herrings because being a sniper is not a high percentage game. You may have to take more than one shot to hit a moving target and they did not have that allowance. That is why the real killers had to be up close to ensure that Kennedy was finished in the melee that resulted.

The question is this, who were the guys on the lawn or the grassy knoll (if it even makes sense to have anybody there?), and who was the driver.

I think that Jackie jumped away not in fear but in knowledge of what was going on and trying to prevent harm to herself.

Secret Service Agent William Greer was the driver of the limo. He didn't shoot anybody, but he did manage to tromp on the brake when the shooting started, rather than the gas. Stupid move, but not part of the conspiracy.

Greer Did It!!

Besides, THIS dude says it was the Dark Complected Man!

Umbrella Man & DCM v. Spider-Man

[edit on 23-3-2006 by Enkidu]

I don't believe that for a minute. How does this explain Gov. Connally getting shot?.

[edit on 23-3-2006 by Prometheus3]

You have me on your side, so Jackie was not a dummy, she prohibited any/all dis-closures in her will of any part of this until I think it was 2048, so that all concerned would be dead.

The object you outline in more clear prints is obviously Agent Kellerman's head, or more precisely his hair glowing in the sunlight. There are at least five witnesses however who suggest they heard "firecrackers coming from the car," and other such notions by way of the smell of things. The Driver, agent Greer is only out of procedure by actually stopping the car rather than flooring it at the first sign of danger. The Film of William Cooper looks like a third generation copy, whereas the more recent digitally remastered versions are far more clear. There are some questions about editing however, but Cooper's picture looks like a red herring, another hidden straw man argument. The point is this Zapruder film actually proves nothing, since the chain of evidence involved is subject to alteration.

Originally posted by Prometheus3

I don't believe that for a minute. How does this explain Gov. Connally getting shot?.

Connally, who was in on the assassination, was turning to deliver the final shot, when his own gun accidentally went off, wounding himself. It's all there in the photos.

Originally posted by Enkidu
Secret Service Agent William Greer was the driver of the limo. He didn't shoot anybody, but he did manage to tromp on the brake when the shooting started, rather than the gas. Stupid move, but not part of the conspiracy.

Greer Did It!!

Besides, THIS dude says it was the Dark Complected Man!

Umbrella Man & DCM v. Spider-Man

[edit on 23-3-2006 by Enkidu]

Uh why would a guy trained to move away fast put on the brake??

Not a good answer frankly. also he turned around why? Not his job to do that. As the driver of the vehicle holding the President of the USA, his job when trouble starts is to get him outta there ASAP..

Look what happens when the Queen or the Pope or somebody else gets nervous in a motorcade... they get the Heck out of there and if you are in the way then you are dead!

something stinks in that deal man.

all of you need to find the documentary "beyond the magic bullet". this film proves beyond any doubt that the shots came from Oswald alone! these guys went to great lengths to try to duplicate the shot and even surprised themselves! by great lengths I mean not only didthey use the same ammunition but got some fro the same manufacturing lot number of that which Oswald used. very convincing documentary indeed.

I agree with the poster above, it really doesnt matter WHO shot him anyway. the real question lies in who ordered it and why. I remember reading something about a speech JFK had given just weeks prior to being shot and alluding to revelations that would shake things up quite a bit. anyone have more info on this? the true answers may lie there.