posted on Oct, 6 2003 @ 08:04 AM
I have always thought Pakistan being an ally is a sick joke. Pakistan is full of militant groups, it's a dictatorship, it has an illegal nuclear
weapons program, the ISI has been heavily involved in terrorist activity for years. If Pakistan really did fully support the 'war on terror', there
would be a coup and the country would fall into the hands of really extreme elements of the leadership. The man who designed the Pakistani bomb, is
very keen to see its testing on humans, i.e. India. Does this seem like an ally in the war against terrorism to anyone?
More like a country that should be no. 1 on the hit list in a real war on terror.
This article is old, but the site has a lot of info on Pakistan.
www.pakistan-facts.com...
"Compared to other terrorist states (such as Iraq and Libya) where the sponsorship of terrorism is embodied in the leadership, Pakistan represents
the institutionalized sponsorship of terrorism. In other words, while Iraq and Libya are dangerous terrorist states, the elimination of Saddam Hussein
or Col. Gaddafi may be enough to return them to the comity of nations. However, Pakistan has used terrorism as an instrument of state policy through
the tenure of General Zia ul-Haq, Benazir Bhutto, Nawaz Sharif and now General Musharraf . What this means is that state sponsorship of terrorism in
Pakistan is institutional in nature rather than embodied in the leadership. The most obvious analogy is to the Soviet Union where the antipathy to
freedom outlasted numerous leaders."