posted on Feb, 27 2006 @ 07:04 AM
to be contrary
.....
i gagree - that the evidence against a giant marine mamal or other air breather is quote overwheming
the evidence any " hidden " caverns / caves where a creature of any stripe could lair , unmolested is water tight - no pun intended
the evidence against it having an " escape " route to the sea , by any means - is a slam dunk . there is no whay that any giant crypid could migrate
to the sea - and return unseen is laughable - and yess i have seen the sliiy claims that there is a " tunnel to the sea " so many times - its no
longer funny
however these facts do not preclude a gilled amphibian or giant fish
however there IS seperate arguments , which IMHO mostly goes against a water breathing cryptid presence
for example , i cannot find it now - but i remember a lively debate here a while back on the tonnage of shish / eels availiable in the loch - and what
mass of giant preadator could acutally be suppoted