It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Zaphod58
Gee, do you think that MAYBE I was being slightly SARCASTIC in the first part of my reply?
Originally posted by NumberCruncher
External source
www.thereligionofpeace.com...
"...since the fall of Baghdad the U.S. has been directly responsible for only 3.8% of fatalities reported, as many deaths over almost two years as Saddam averaged in 10 days."
"The only way to describe the actions of the U.S. Military in its role of "occupier" is a compassionate and careful army that avoids collateral damage despite its dangerous mandate to hunt for terrorists and non-uniformed combatants hidden within the civilian population. It is nothing short of miraculous that our Armed Forces have been able to eliminate as many terrorists and enemy combatants as they have with so little actual collateral damage."
May Peace be with these poor innocent souls.
We all know the Islamofascists now cause 96pc of the death's in Iraq.
Originally posted by Dronetek
This is true, but I think you would be hard pressed to find another religion that is currently involved in a global jihad. Not to mention one that is currently slaughtering people on a daily basis.
Originally posted by Qoelet
Originally posted by Dronetek
This is true, but I think you would be hard pressed to find another religion that is currently involved in a global jihad. Not to mention one that is currently slaughtering people on a daily basis.
erm... the 'religion' isn't involved... the extremist end of a denomination of a religion is...
and there is plenty of sectarian violence around the world to go round... it just doesnt all fit into an American/European news agenda... look at the intercommunal violence of many different countries... Christian, Muslim and otherwise...
Originally posted by Crakeur
so, let's recap.
not ok for the military to bomb one house in an attempt to kill insurgents hiding out but ok for an insurgent to blow himself up at a funeral and kill 36 mourners and wound another 40. (www.cnn.com...)
everyone understand the difference?
don't worry. I don't either.
Originally posted by Crakeur
everyone understand the difference?
don't worry. I don't either.
Originally posted by Crakeur
1. the military didn't intend to kill a family. they were blowing up a building that they thought was being used as a hideout for insurgents. if the insurgents would stop using homes, mosques and other public areas for hideouts, these kinds of ACCIDENTS wouldn't happen.
Originally posted by nukunuku
look if the US army is so mighty and powerfull and wants to make a good image of itself, do it like HR said, on foot, house by house, that would surely minimize civilian casualties.
But US army isnt like that (modern warfare for that matter), they didnt even set a foot in Serbia while bombing the bajolas out of civilian trains, chinese embassy...etc
Besides you have to drop the big ones somewhere as well dont you, to make room for new ones....business is just too good these days
some army, pih, if it wasnt for the ultra high tech that is years in front of anything others have you be peeing your panties while crazy arabs chase you out of THEIR country with knives.
Originally posted by WestPoint23
Souljah despite your spin and hatred for US Forces this is a terrible accident and one that will no doubt happen in any war, to date there is no way to fight a casualty free war. In my opinion comparing of the air campaign in Iraq to the carpet-bombing of WWII is completely ridicules. Despite what you might like to think Souljah the US was and is currently spending more money and technology to making more precision guided weapons to minimize, not eliminate, because you cannot eliminate collateral damage in a war, especially in a urban war.
Originally posted by Souljah
Still that is not the Way to Fight Urban Warfare - IMHO the Coalition troops are far too heavy armed for that; sending Warplanes after 3 Terrorist Suspects that were digging something by the Road? Maybe they were NOT installing a Roadside Bomb - still, the are Dead now.
And Dead Men Tell no Tales.
[edit on 4/1/06 by Souljah]
Originally posted by djohnsto77
The fact that this is news at all is a sign of how far we've come in avoiding civilian casualties through better technologies.
Originally posted by Crakeur
Souljah, do you have any the comparison between suicide bombing at a funeral (or mosque or military convoy handing out food to children) and the precision bombings?