It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by The Vagabond
If the Taepo Dong 2 can do what it's supposed to and ends up in Iranian hands, we're going to be dealing with something completely unprecedented.
Nuclear proliferation is dangerous. A nuclear Iran is in a position to be particular dangerous. They have every motive to do it and very little motive not to. Things have not come anywhere near as bad as they have the potential to be in a worst case scenario, and that makes this the best possible time to exhaust every peaceful alternative and do it sincerely, and then, but only then, if necessary, resort to force before the worst case scenario draws near.
Originally posted by HumanBean
Unfortunately, it's a little more complicated than that
I for one would rather see all the money that currently goes to NASA redirected to energy research and the like. Exploring space is important but we have to clean up our own back yard first
UN Security Council may receive Iran complaint this month
By News Agencies
The UN Security Council may be asked to consider action against Iran this month after Tehran spurned international warnings and resumed nuclear
fuel research, a key diplomat said on Wednesday.
An expected referral to the council from the governing board of the Vienna-based International Atomic Energy Agency, or IAEA, would put the controversy in the hands of the 15-nation council, which could impose sanctions.
www.haaretz.com...
Originally posted by 27jd
Right, but if China made such a deal with Iran, then I don't see it likely they want Iran to go waving nukes at Israel,
if nuclear conflict erupts, there goes their oil.
I think they'd rather cut a behind the scenes deal with the west and perhaps share control than see it all go up in smoke, especially if they depend on it that much, don't you?
China has no love for the Iranian government, all they care about is the oil.
Originally posted by Omniscient
What if the Republic has become the very evil we've been trying to destroy." I can't varify if that is a 100% exact quote, the word "Republic" may have been a different word, but I think this is an excellent quote to describe what is happening with these wars.
A war in Iran will most likely only provoke more question within the UN about the United States stability. Hopefully they see the fast-paced progression to the status of an Empire being enacted in the U.S., and can find a non-hostile way of preventing this and future wars over the "ambition of WMDs."
Originally posted by Omniscient
I haven't been on this site for months, so I just thought I'd jump in.
Originally posted by EastCoastKid
Of course they don't. If the Chinese are into anything, it's discretion. Iran might just be acting so beligerently b/c they know that China has their back; possibly Russia, too.
Whose to say this isn't a further PNAC measure to wrest/keep western control over those same oil fields, and of OPEC? If we can snatch it first.. so goes the thinking. It's delusional, but I digress.
The US government has no love for Iran, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, or any other mideastern government, either. The US government does not have friends; it has associates.
Originally posted by Omniscient
Well, to be honest. I've not very sure about many recent events regarding this. I haven't been on this site for months, so I just thought I'd jump in.
Originally posted by 27jd
the U.S. and China rely heavily on each other economy wise. I really wouldn't be surprised if they were in cahoots with us more than you or I know.
Originally posted by EastCoastKid
Think back to the days pre-9-11, Rumsfeld was making a lot of noise about the China threat. No one wanted to hear him. On that, I agreed with him.
And don't forget, China and Russia have been doing joint-military training. That's a first.
Originally posted by EastCoastKid
Hey everybody,
I ran across this article today. It's an excellent analysis on Iran and its capabilities, by William Rivers Pitt.
Attack on Iran: A Looming Folly
By William Rivers Pitt
t r u t h o u t | Perspective
Monday 09 January 2006
The wires have been humming since before the New Year with reports that the Bush administration is planning an attack on Iran. "The Bush administration is preparing its NATO allies for a possible military strike against suspected nuclear sites in Iran in the New Year, according to German media reports, reinforcing similar earlier suggestions in the Turkish media," reported UPI on December 30th.
"The Berlin daily Der Tagesspiegel this week," continued UPI, "quoted 'NATO intelligence sources' who claimed that the NATO allies had been informed that the United States is currently investigating all possibilities of bringing the mullah-led regime into line, including military options. This 'all options are open' line has been President George W Bush's publicly stated policy throughout the past 18 months."
An examination of the ramifications of such an attack is desperately in order.
1. Blowback in Iraq
The recent elections in Iraq were dominated by an amalgam of religiously fundamentalist Shi'ite organizations, principally the Dawa Party and the Supreme Council for Islamic Revolution in Iraq (SCIRI). Both Dawa and SCIRI have umbilical connections to the fundamentalist Shi'ite leadership in Iran that go back decades. In essence, Iran now owns a significant portion of the Iraqi government.
www.truthout.org...