WAR: Iran Sent Forged Ballots to Iraq

Originally posted by djohnsto77
I'm not sure if we really know what happened...did the NY Times ever issue a retraction?

I doubt it. Even if they did you can bet they would never put it on the internet simply because it would make them look bad.

Rathergate anyone

Originally posted by Seekerof

Originally posted by Flinx
So let me get this right, FOX News is the best source for balanced information out there? Well I suppose people can convince themselves of anything...

Never once indicated such, did I?
Your inference to FOX and to what I have already commented on is along the lines of putting words in my mouth.

I said what I said, because according to you, as with others, the New York Times and CNN never post nothing but truth, as compared to FOX. Obviously, as indicated by this topic and what was discovered, that type thinking is and has been ludicrous and mistaken.

My comment goes beyond what you've said in this thread. Remember than whole X on Cheney's face is proof of CNN's horriblly left-wing bias thread? To be honest, I'm fed up with the conservative persecution complex thing. My assertions were the result of months of reading comments from you and other ATS pundits like the 3 or so Roman-themed guys. But whatever, I think it's against the rules to refer to people's comments in a different thread. I think.

Just as my mention and commentary to you was based upon your own past comments in regards to the sanctity of CNN and the New York Times and how bogus FOXNEWS was and is.

The problem here is what?
When the stone is cast back, the tables are turned, you cry foul?





seekerof

Originally posted by Seekerof
Just as my mention and commentary to you was based upon your own past comments in regards to the sanctity of CNN and the New York Times and how bogus FOXNEWS was and is.

The problem here is what?
When the stone is cast back, the tables are turned, you cry foul?

No problem at all. It's simple, we just have irreconcilable differences. You have problems with things I've said, I have problems with things you've said...ok almost everything you say.

I'm not crying foul, I wasn't even aware that you were refering to my previous comments. It's been quite I while since I've commented on FOX news seeing as how I'm mainly interested in the esoteric stuff on ATS rather that the political. I refer to your past comments, and you do the same....fair enough.

Originally posted by Seekerof

Iran would not do such. Iran has not sent foreign fighters into Iraq. Iran has not equipped insurgents. Iran is only seeking a peaceful nuclear weapons arsenal. Iran is not a radical nation. The Holocaust never happened. Israel is bad and Iran is good. Have no fear people, Saddam will be vindicated and returned to power. America evil. Iran good. Die infidels. 72 virgins anyone?

All you said... how true, how true 8^)
What if it's actually not 72 virgins, but one virgin who's 72?

Seriously, that 72-virgin thing is a mis-interpretation; it's something like ".... a bowl of grapes of great clarity...." So these people are killing themselves over a bowl of fruit?





seekerof

[edit on 14-12-2005 by Seekerof]

Originally posted by Flinx

Originally posted by Seekerof

Originally posted by Flinx
So let me get this right, FOX News is the best source for balanced information out there? Well I suppose people can convince themselves of anything...

Never once indicated such, did I?
Your inference to FOX and to what I have already commented on is along the lines of putting words in my mouth.

I said what I said, because according to you, as with others, the New York Times and CNN never post nothing but truth, as compared to FOX. Obviously, as indicated by this topic and what was discovered, that type thinking is and has been ludicrous and mistaken.

My comment goes beyond what you've said in this thread. Remember than whole X on Cheney's face is proof of CNN's horriblly left-wing bias thread? To be honest, I'm fed up with the conservative persecution complex thing. My assertions were the result of months of reading comments from you and other ATS pundits like the 3 or so Roman-themed guys. But whatever, I think it's against the rules to refer to people's comments in a different thread. I think.

The guy who did it (the "X") said it was a "....free speech thing." Puleeeeze.

Yeah.... THEIR free speech, not yours.