It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Saying that Iraq's elected government and constitution is illegitimate because of the American occupation and because of our vested interest in the results, would be like saying that Germany and Japan's governments are illegitimate. They were created under similar circumstances.
Originally posted by Jakomo
Would you care to enumerate, say, 10 ways in which the post-WWII occupations of Germany and Japan by the Allies are in any way similar to the Illegal War and Occupation of Iraq by the United States and Britain? I would be fascinated to hear them.
The differences are astounding, and not just due to the fact that one happened 60 years ago.
Originally posted by Jakomo
If you have a limited choice of candidates, it is NOT a free election (it’s totalitarianism, just ask Iran).
Wednesday, 16 October, 2002, 11:41 GMT 12:41 UK
Saddam 'wins 100% of vote'
Iraqi officials say President Saddam Hussein has won 100% backing in a referendum on whether he should rule for another seven years.
There were 11,445,638 eligible voters - and every one of them voted for the president, according to Izzat Ibrahim, Vice-Chairman of Iraq's Revolutionary Command Council.
Saddam Hussein - who has ruled Iraq since 1979 - was the only candidate.
Because of security fears there were even fewer international monitors in Iraq, so they couldn’t accurately decide on the accuracy of the voter counts (it doesn’t matter as much who votes and who COUNTS the votes).
The Sunnis stayed away from the polling station in droves, meaning they are not going to be represented.
Oh and fyi, the whole referendum was a total sham. The Iraqi people had no say in the draft constitution, which was drawn up behind closed doors by pro-occupation parties and US officials, or in what questions would be asked on the referendum. How is that democratic?