Use The Big Guns in Iraq

nukes in iraq

yeah cool

now , remind me again who is the target and being glassed???


you cannot use nukes to fight unconventional troops

the best option is specialist troops against them , and not using WMD`s again as that doesn`t work.

smart idea, yeah, no 99% civillian casualties, no radiation sickness, no unusable land for generations.......DUDE!I strongly disagree with you




mad....

Mod Edit: Removed Personal Insult.

Mod Note: Terms & Conditions Of Use – Please Review This Link.

Mod Note: WOT Posting Conduct – Please Review Link.

[edit on 24/11/2005 by Mirthful Me]

Originally posted by Seekerof

What is there to neglect?
How do you know that what killirl mentions was not an intended strategy?

seekerof

Right, it is better to keep them occupied in the middle east than having to deal with them on our own soil.

It's time to cool out. The thread was put up to get people the think what things are cominig to, not to insult, but rather to think obout how to get out of the possibel situation we are getting into. It is not meant to offend. If it does then the dicussion is at an end.
If we can't share the worst and best of whats on peoples minds, then we should go back to drawing pictures on the cave wall! If we don't talk we will be slamed into the real nuke world. What a shame!

Of course a thread like this is going to offend people. I still dont understand how somebody could think nuclear weapons is a solution to anything.

Its gone beyond the stage where the use of WMD`s has any benefit whatsoever ;

monk - who is the target? name a military installation that could be attacked with Atomic`s?

Look at Fallujah - the use of WP and WMD`s has been reported , widely , and has been universily condemned for causing death on a massive scale (whether true or otherwise).

So who do you want to nuke - name 1 target ; that won`t cause the mid east to go up in flames and have a billion people joing Al_qaeda