It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
So it is HE who is guilty of breaching the arrangement, not Angelina.
Originally posted by DontTreadOnMe
C'mon guys, let's get off the star-struck gossip
path and back to the paranormal.
Originally posted by mrwupy
Now if Jolie would have set Anniston on fire and danced naked around the flaming body while cutting off the head of a chicken, This might have been worth my time.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
In some states, when a man leaves his wife for another woman
(or a woman leaves her husband for another man) something
called 'Alienation of affection' is invoked. The third party is
indeed 'guilty' and has to pay the grieved party (in this case
Jennifer Anniston) for damages.
Today, courts and legislatures in all but seven states have abolished the use of these lawsuits: Besides Mississippi, the other states that still allow them are Illinois, Hawaii, New Mexico, North Carolina, South Dakota and Utah.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
So it is HE who is guilty of breaching the arrangement, not Angelina.
In some states, when a man leaves his wife for another woman
(or a woman leaves her husband for another man) something
called 'Alienation of affection' is invoked. The third party is
indeed 'guilty' and has to pay the grieved party (in this case
Jennifer Anniston) for damages.
It's a legal thing. My neighbor was entitled to sue the woman
who 'stole' her husband. That was in Connecticut many years
ago.
Originally posted by crusader
Ahh now that I got your goodly attentions, may i refer you to my thread, at ATs, called How to control people? this is one of the methods of control, have people obsessed with these mundane things and have them take their minds over what really matters.
BTW: they are to wed on Dec 1st