Satellite Image of Plane Hitting Pentagon

[img][/img]

[edit on 29-10-2005 by steakhoge]

Have you nothing to say?

Well judging from the shadow of the plane it looks to be at a higher altitude than it would be to hit the building. Are you sure this was taken on 9/11/01?

Yep. Photoshopped. That plane would have an immediate shadow for this to be real.

Zip

I believe it 's photoshoped , the shadow is to large and the plane is to high just MHO.

where are the rest of the picuters?

[edit on 30/10/2005 by Sauron]

It's not even the right angle, wasn't it supposed to have come in like this...



If you look close it also looks like the plane is climbing, I maybe wrong but the shadow is at the wing trailing edges and highlighted at the leading edges.
If it was in a downward dive it wouldn't it be the other way around???

[edit on 30/10/2005 by ANOK]

That pic may have been photoshopped as has been said, but the relative size of the shadow as well as the apparent size of the plane relative to the other features in the picture (such as cars, etc.) appears to be bang on. Where did you get that picture from anyway?

[edit on 30-10-2005 by Astronomer68]

Has to be fake... even though hard to make out the cars show a slight blur. Now assuming that they are moving about 65mph or slower...probably much slower, then the plane would have to be going much slower than this to keep from being blurred. Since we know that it hit at a very high velocity, then it too would have to be blurred. However some clever photoshop work though.

P.S. The shadow does not slope with the terrain.

____________________________________________________________
Be Cool
K_OS

Originally posted by K_OS
However some clever photoshop work though.

Good point on the blur maybe some motion blur would have looked more realistic, but I wouldn't say particularly clever photoshop work.
I did my version in 5 minutes and I had to move the plane/shadow and then erase the old one.
I could make that orig in 2 minutes, not including a search for a stock pic that fits.
Very basic photoshop work.

[edit on 30/10/2005 by ANOK]

Originally posted by Astronomer68
That pic may have been photoshopped as has been said, but the relative size of the shadow as well as the apparent size of the plane relative to the other features in the picture (such as cars, etc.) appears to be bang on. Where did you get that picture from anyway?

If it is a real picture, it’s not spot on for size. Compare the tiny dots that are cars in that photo to a picture of ramp equipment next to a 757 at an airport and you will notice that this plane is much too large. This meaning that it’s either closer to the camera (altitude), or its photoshopped and out of scale. I am guessing that it’s the first. If I wanted to do something like this I would look for an airport, then follow the runways until I found an aircraft on approach. Once I had that aircraft, simply paint it, and its shadow, unto a picture of the Pentagon from the same zoom level as I took the plane. The plane also does not appear to be a 757 to me, it looks too fat, and 757’s are very thin. If I had to guess I would say a 767, it almost looks like an L1011, but I cannot make out the tail well enough to see if there is an engine in it. The thickness of the body may just be shadows however.

This just in

New sattelite photo found of mysterious object on collision course with the Pentagoon.





Sorry not making fun of this thread, but just wanted to show how easy it is to fake pics like this.

Originally posted by ANOK

Originally posted by K_OS
However some clever photoshop work though.

Good point on the blur maybe some motion blur would have looked more realistic, but I wouldn't say particularly clever photoshop work.
I did my version in 5 minutes and I had to move the plane/shadow and then erase the old one.
I could make that orig in 2 minutes, not including a search for a stock pic that fits.
Very basic photoshop work.

The picture of the aircraft is not hard to find, all you have to do is look for an airport, then follow the runway out until you find an aircraft on approach or take off. There are some nice pictures of TIA, on one of those sites, showing three different planes on approach into TIA over the bay, one on the runway, and one that just took off. All you have to do is note the zoom level that you stole the picture from and make sure your terrain is at the same zoom level.

steakhoge, did you post this photo on putfile or did you find it there? I'm interested in where this photo came from.

Don't you guys think the plane looks to big (or too high up)?

From www.abovetopsecret.com...



The wall is 7.4 jets long. The plane in th e(fake) photo would fit about 4 times on the same wall.


ANOK, you shadow work on the guitar looks more realistic than the questionable photo.

Right Defcon, wouldn't be hard to find a pic to fit at all. In fact I found a bunch when I did that last pic. Just thought what I used would be funnier, and ram the point home a little better.

After looking at that pic some more the plane is climbing slightly and banking to the left, not on a collision course at all. Looks like it's just taken off from an airport.

Did you do the photoshop Steakhoge? C'mon admit it. It's not even from a web site, just uploaded to a picture hosting site.

[edit on 30/10/2005 by ANOK]

Originally posted by Umbrax

Don't you guys think the plane looks to big (or too high up)?

Yep, too big, too high up, and not really heading for the pentagoon at all, as I said above it's climbing and banking to the left.

And as was mentioned by K_OS too sharp to be doing the speed it supposedly was. The shadow looks to sharp too. My bet is it was a plane just after take off.

And thanx for the guitar shadow comment!

Here i am almost 100% sure this is a Delta 757, on google maps:

Picture:
Inbound Flight

An MD-80 on runway

[edit on 10/30/2005 by defcon5]

Just found this...

www.tric.u-tokai.ac.jp...

That's what a satellite pic of a plane looks like.

I don't think that pic posted is even a satellite pic? Too sharp, probably taken from an aircraft?

[edit on 30/10/2005 by ANOK]

For that photo to be real, the plane has to have dropped down atleast twice the height of the Pentagon while it crossed the road and crossed the lawn at 400-500 mph all in a matter of 10ths of a second. For that to have happened, the pilot would have to be strapped down like mental patient having a fit in the pilots seat to be able to control the plane with the amount of force with that type of approach and drop, which would be pinning him against the roof of the cockpit otherwise.

In other words, it's as real as Michael Jackons nose - a bad hack job.

I can't believe this was missed...

The shadows are from the Sun in the West. Very late afternoon, or early evening. West is to the left in the photo.

Note the shadows from the trees in the interior courtyard. Very distinctive, relative to the height of the trees.

I don't think that was the right time of day for when the aircraft hit the Pentagon.

The aircraft struck at 9:43 AM ESDT, These shadows are more like 5:00 PM or 6:00 PM.

Not to mention that if you look real close, the shadow from the aircraft is going the wrong direction.

I just checked www.fourmilab.ch... for the sun angle at that time (13:43 UTC) for that day. The Sun was over the mid-Atlantic at that time. Shadows would have been distinctly to the West, with the Sun in the East.

[edit on 2-11-2005 by ZPE StarPilot]

[edit on 2-11-2005 by ZPE StarPilot]

Look at this photo that shows the missing/clipped light poles from the approaching aircraft. The angle of approach that the questionable picture shows would not have hit those light poles.

That photo of the "plane" has most certainly been doctored. This is because the shadow of the plane is not changing with the terrain nor is the aircraft lower than what it should be. Besides, how in the world did the 757 that supposedly hit the Pentagon miss the overhead sign on The Washington/ Alexandria Beltway that was in it's path?