It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

American Wars

page: 1
0

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 14 2003 @ 04:37 PM
link   
Why does America always end up fighting guys that has alot less money so that they are at such a bad advantage as far as money and trainig goes, so why dont we ever end up fighting someone that has an equal amount of training, if not more than us, to actually have a challenge in the war instead of using are overwhelming reputation to win the war? What do you think?



posted on Sep, 14 2003 @ 04:42 PM
link   
Its because we have #head leaders who dont care thats why. And there really isnt anyone elft on the planet with equal amount of money or training left to fight. So, too feed thier hungry money grubbing war machine, they have to content with smaller pickings.



posted on Sep, 14 2003 @ 04:47 PM
link   
That all makes sense, but think about it, the one country that we have a chance of actuyally losing too and may have to put in some extra preparation for, is North Korea, who we happened to be scared shi***** of. I have nothing against our military or governmet, but come on, i thought America was strong, not little wusses who are scared of the nuclear scholl yard bully. Especially if we can match their nuclear power.



posted on Sep, 14 2003 @ 06:36 PM
link   
We tend to avoid wars with serious adversaries because there is the chance we will loose. All countries do that. Its common sense. Your goal in any war is to have an advantage over your enemy. You dont want to be evenly matched.



posted on Sep, 14 2003 @ 06:51 PM
link   

Your goal in any war is to have an advantage over your enemy. You dont want to be evenly matched.
Shh. You make too much sense.



posted on Sep, 14 2003 @ 07:55 PM
link   
It goes like this:
1-The US interferes with a small country by helping it.Loans and industrial support and so on.
2-We tack a bunch of clauses on their contract,they accept because they are desparate.
3-The corporations Move in posing as lending assistance.
4-The weaker country recovers,they realise they are being used,they lash out by telling The US that they want to have their country to themselves.
5-The US eliminates the annoying government of said country somehow,and inserts a puppet regime.
6-The weaker country is milked by corporations until they are fed up.
7-The puppet regime begins to feel the same way as the population,they lash out,then they are accused of being communist to gain the support of US citizen cattle.
8-Then the US sends troops in to steal the resources they were stealing in the first place,of course with the approval of the citizens since they are fighting communism or something the citizens have been told that they are offended by,they get emotional and stop using their brain.
9-This is how third world countries are made to stay third world countries.
North Korea is a problem for the gubbermint,cuz they been there done that and ain't gonna go there and do that again
It's Imperialism,we learned it from the British,it nearly destroyed the British and the US hasn't got enough foresight to see it is headed the same way they did.
The US government has $$$$$ in it's eyes.
GREED
And no,this is not a British bashing thread,it is only the truth.



posted on Sep, 20 2003 @ 09:41 PM
link   
We trained half of the world's terrorists, and the other half still work for us...
There's only about ten or twenty, true "terrorists" out there.
If we ever got into a war with a formidable enemy, we'd probably use too many of our illegal bombs on them.
When fighting cheap countries like Iraq, we can use all of those "new" precision bombs and whatnot...
The war on Iraq was more just being there than actually fighting.
Most deaths were caused by Americans, Britians, or foreign terrorists.
- Tass



new topics

top topics



 
0

log in

join