Family Guy Creator Missed his Flight on 9/11.. how many did?

Ok, well I have known this for a while but have been thinking more and more about it after reading about OPERATION NORTHWOODS.

For those of you who don't know Seth McFarlane is a producer/creator/voice-guy for the fabulous show Family Guy and American Dad.

He was booked on Flight 11 on September 11, and was given the wrong time by his travel agent. So he showed up too late.. I was wondering, if there was some kind of 'people-switch' or even plane-switch, how many people were given the wrong time? told the flight was overbooked?

I think this is possibly just ONE of many 'missed-a-9/11-flight' experiences, only we only hear about his because he is somewhat famous.

What do you think? Anyone heared of any more?

[edit on 12-9-2005 by ekul08]

Hmmm.. I didnt know about that one.. It would certainly be worth looking into. I will go have a look myself.

Family Guy Creator Missed his Flight on 9/11..



...That's insane

[edit on 12-9-2005 by JD Salinger]

Originally posted by JD Salinger
Family Guy Creator Missed his Flight on 9/11..



...That's insane

[edit on 12-9-2005 by JD Salinger]

This may come as a shock, but your supposed to read the entire post before posting Usually helps to make your reply more constructive than a smart a** comment... just a tip

How much more would you appreciate life after having an experience as he has. I believe this is one of the biggest mistakes we make; we do not appreciate what we have until it's gone. Human nature I guess, anyone have any thoughts or experiences to share about how they have come to make the most of every moment

Speaking of famous people in this incident.

Jackie Chan was supposively going to do a shoot in the WTC the morning of 9/11 also..

I heard this soon after 9/11 I think on NBC or CNN or something... cant remember.

I always find these things really interesting, were there any other famous (or not) people that were meant to be there but werent? or missed flights etc?

For people that think the planes were switched and millitary planes were sued or any of that nonsense, tell that to the creator of the hit show Frasier or Nysync's tour roadee or one of the female commentators on Bill Maher's old show. These people all perished on those planes.

I didnt know about the Family Guy creator missing his flight.

I do know that James Woods saw some of the 9/11 hijackers on a plane in Phoenix 2 weeks prior, confirmed by the FBI. odd.

One the conspiracy FACTS is the odd number of people on all of the hijacked flights.

None of the planes were anywhere near capacity but were rather oddly low in numbers for those flights at those times.

The reason this is important is that it suggest two things.

1. Either the Terrorists some how knew these flights would be under-booked
or
2. They were deliberatly under-booked to assist in the hijacking.

The belief is that there were less hijackers than we've been told.
Those chosen believed they were hijacking the planes for another plan all together (a typical hijack/ransom/threat scenario for example, a known psy-op proceedure OR even part of the 'live drills' that WERE taking place that morning) but either way, they did not know their fates or the full plan - they were expendable.
The hijackers job was just to get control of the cockpit.
The planes were deliberately under-booked to assist the hijackers.
Once they had control of the cockpit, the real plan went into action.
The planes controls were taken over via remote control.
The planes were either depressurized or gassed, killing all on board including the hijackers.
The planes were flown to their GPS targets.
Flight 93 was escorted by fighter pilots who got no response from the plane because there was no one alive to respond.
They knew the plane was heading toward the Capital, either for the Whitehouse or Congress.
The pilots followed proceedure and shot down flight 93 with two Side-Winder missiles but they didn't have authority to do so.
This created the 'Lets Roll' story and that the passangers of 93 dumped the plane making them heros because otherwise it would led to investigation as to why the plane was shot down which would led to Blackbox investigation showing ZERO statistics on cockpit activity proving the plane being full of dead people. This would of led back to the Maestro's (mainly Cheney) eventually so they cemented a typical 'American heros' story into the mainstream and ended it there.
It's obvious that plane was shot down by witness testimony and the crash itself being typical of a shoot down rather than a crash.

No blackboxs are found or used in any way because none of them record any active presence in the cockpit as the planes were remote controlled.




[edit on 13-9-2005 by TheShroudOfMemphis]

the knock out gas and remote control theory is one of the only wild theories alex jones supports, but where does this come from?

I agree there is no doubt that 93 was brought down by missle. Even Rumsfeld slipped and said it.

when did rumsfield say it had been shot by a missile ????

I thought it was his secretary who said it, but about the wtc?

Originally posted by ryan25
when did rumsfield say it had been shot by a missile ????

He said it on an interview with Brigadier General James Marks that aired on December 24th, 2004.

I think all of us have a sense if we imagine the kind of world we would face if the people who bombed the mess hall in Mosul, or the people who did the bombing in Spain, or the people who attacked the United States in New York, shot down the plane over Pennsylvania and attacked the Pentagon, the people who cut off peoples' heads on television to intimidate, to frighten -- indeed the word 'terrorized' is just that. Its purpose is to terrorize, to alter behavior, to make people be something other than that which they want to be.

edition.cnn.com...
911research.wtc7.net...

Originally posted by 8bitagent
the knock out gas and remote control theory is one of the only wild theories alex jones supports, but where does this come from?

I agree there is no doubt that 93 was brought down by missle. Even Rumsfeld slipped and said it.

Remote controlled theory is supported by a lot of evidence, more so than the assumption that bad pilots could of flown those planes.

As for knock out gas, that could be hard but decompressing the plane can be done in seconds and it was recently sighted as the cause for a recent plane crash which killed everyone on board.

The reason the passangers were knocked out and the planes were no longer being flown by anyone other than a remote unit is WHY the 93 was shot down with no order, it was because the plane had no one in the cockpit visable and it was not answering to regular intecept protocol. The pilots knew where it was heading, everyone watching it knew where it was heading.
The pilots made that call themselves, the government tried to cover it up with a story which takes the heat off all the other elements which brought that situation on.
They blatently lied about the passangers taking over the plane via a passangers call of 'Let's Roll!'. The only way they could excuse themselves from bringing that plane down and hiding why, is to say the passangers were responsable for the crash. That automatically cuts off any other train of thought. If it's true the passangers caused the crash, then no other evidence can be valid right? But if one lie is exposed then one domino falls....









[edit on 13-9-2005 by TheShroudOfMemphis]