posted on Aug, 28 2005 @ 12:45 AM
To be honest, the witness aspect of the events of 9-11 is not my strongest area related to this issue. Perhaps someone else can step up to the plate
and link to some relevant witness accounts if there are any at this stage.
Still dissembling and avoiding the subject of this thread I see.
What do they call this? oh yeah its ad hominim isn't it.
I think you mean
ad hominem, which means "against the person". If I came across as attacking you instead of the issue, I apologize,
for that was not my intent. My intent was to confirm your support of your own logic when it is applied to other cases of conspiracy , and in
particular one which you perhaps DO believe in. Your premise is based on the logic that if there are no "credible" witnesses come forward in
mainstream media to corroborate an aspect of a conspiracy, then the conspiracy theory is therefore automatically bunkum. I addressed your logic
because your debunking is central to that logic being valid, and I feel that it is
not valid and the logic is flawed. Didn't mean to upset
you, nor to attack you. I'll bow out now and let you have at it.