It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ABC_123
Hello I've been in the background reading, this is my first post. I'm just a US citizen who has read enough to become suspicious of the 9/11 events. There are a few questions I have not seen anyone addressing. Perhaps I came in on this discussion too late, so I'm hoping someone can point me in the right direction
1. Since there are so many witnesses who say they heard explosions in the WTT's 1 + 2, for now I will assume that is indeed how they fell. Ok, so then I think, under any normal crime scene investigation of a bombing, wouldn't there be a search into all the different companies which could manufacture the kind of explosives that could have been used ? One site I read mentioned they thought thermite had been used. Using that as a possibility, has anyone actually gotten a list of those companies and questioned them to find a link? Like where were their employees the days that proceed 9/11?
2. Following along that explosives were used to bring the towers down; I would think that only certain people would have the expertise to plant all the explosives. Do we know who those experts are?
3. Or maybe I'm wrong..so how likely would it be that anyone with a little knowledge of bombs could learn to implode buildings so perfectly to have them fall as the towers did? I mean there are lots of bombings in the world today, so could a terrorist cell have learned enough about implosions to do this? Example such as leaving many, many car bombs in the parking lot below ground level to all go off at a certain time?
4. I read and heard Silverstein's comment on bdg #7 about "pulling it" over and over again on many sites, but has anyone ever questioned him again? If not, why? It would seem some journalist would have done this by now. So did Silverstein go into hiding now or what?
5. Also in regards to #7, I read on site which said the firefighters had been told to vacate the premises because they thought it was too dangerous. Which leaves me to wondering ...why if the firemen would not go in the building would they allow other people in to set the explosives? This doesn't make sense to me; I've never heard of any firemen allowing anyone to go into a building that was on fire? Comments?
Ok, I guess those are just a few of the questions I have for now. Thanks ahead of time if you can help..
Ok, so then I think, under any normal crime scene investigation of a bombing, wouldn't there be a search into all the different companies which could manufacture the kind of explosives that could have been used ?
One site I read mentioned they thought thermite had been used.
4. I read and heard Silverstein's comment on bdg #7 about "pulling it" over and over again on many sites, but has anyone ever questioned him again? If not, why? It would seem some journalist would have done this by now. So did Silverstein go into hiding now or what?
The journalist who wrote the hit piece, Sam Smith, directly questioned Silverstein. Silverstein told Smith that he "meant something else" by the "pull it" comment but mysteriously refused to elaborate any further.
5. Also in regards to #7, I read on site which said the firefighters had been told to vacate the premises because they thought it was too dangerous. Which leaves me to wondering ...why if the firemen would not go in the building would they allow other people in to set the explosives? This doesn't make sense to me; I've never heard of any firemen allowing anyone to go into a building that was on fire? Comments?
Originally posted by ABC_1231. Since there are so many witnesses who say they heard explosions in the WTT's 1 + 2, for now I will assume that is indeed how they fell.
Originally posted by ABC_123
Ok, so then I think, under any normal crime scene investigation of a bombing, wouldn't there be a search into all the different companies which could manufacture the kind of explosives that could have been used ? One site I read mentioned they thought thermite had been used. Using that as a possibility, has anyone actually gotten a list of those companies and questioned them to find a link? Like where were their employees the days that proceed 9/11?
Originally posted by ABC_123
2. Following along that explosives were used to bring the towers down; I would think that only certain people would have the expertise to plant all the explosives. Do we know who those experts are?
Originally posted by ABC_123
3. Or maybe I'm wrong..so how likely would it be that anyone with a little knowledge of bombs could learn to implode buildings so perfectly to have them fall as the towers did? I mean there are lots of bombings in the world today, so could a terrorist cell have learned enough about implosions to do this? Example such as leaving many, many car bombs in the parking lot below ground level to all go off at a certain time?
Originally posted by ABC_123
4. I read and heard Silverstein's comment on bdg #7 about "pulling it" over and over again on many sites, but has anyone ever questioned him again? If not, why? It would seem some journalist would have done this by now. So did Silverstein go into hiding now or what?
Originally posted by ABC_123
5. Also in regards to #7, I read on site which said the firefighters had been told to vacate the premises because they thought it was too dangerous. Which leaves me to wondering ...why if the firemen would not go in the building would they allow other people in to set the explosives? This doesn't make sense to me; I've never heard of any firemen allowing anyone to go into a building that was on fire?