Very well researched, quotes with sources, and a library of links (some obviously broken due to time, etc.).
What kept me reading was the moreso factual/chronological/quoted/linked info, with seemingly little supposition, as opposed to taking a 3 line quote
and [pondering it for paragraphs].
I believe that the article or the like from the source it is from has been discussed, in depth, a number of times, as has "before - during - after"
and by all sides of this event(s) and fence.
Just happend across this [the article] and thought it might be of interest.
I realize the overall content has been/is being discussed here on ATS, but was rather impressed with the [overall] factual/timeline/documentary-like
approach without alot of supposition.
Whether the title of the post or the contents of the post have been discussed before is not relevent.
I personally felt that it filled in some gaps and/or broadened the scope.