Author/historian Joseph P. Farrell predicts MH370 was abducted using exotic tech - March 19,2014

a reply to: RickyD

wow you really showed me. thanks for your support.

a reply to: b0kal0ka

Now you seem to be personally proving your signature line.

While I disagree with your position on the videos, I admire your dedication to your signature line.

a reply to: BeyondKnowledge3

appreciate the kind words.

I'll keep replying to these posts until the end of time because this is actually what happened to the plane and the TRUTH will always be on the side of the videos. In time, you will see that too.

a reply to: b0kal0ka

Ignore the grinches! I for one find these posts interesting

a reply to: McGinty

thank you! glad to see some people are at least open to listening. I haven't lost hope for this forum yet!

a reply to: b0kal0ka

You seemed to think proving your own signature line is a compliment.

You really need to spend some time looking in the mirror and contemplating that.

a reply to: BeyondKnowledge3

Keep insulting me normie, I don't care what you think of me. I won't stop talking about these videos.

a reply to: b0kal0ka

Believe what you want but I did not insult you. You did it to yourself.

You are not applying your signature line to yourself. You keep gong back to debunked information over and over again.

Find a new source for this that does not rely on those fake videos. All the threads you have made on this subject go back to those CGI videos that are are obviously fake.

I am trying to help you understand what you are misunderstanding. No insult intended from me.


.

a reply to: BeyondKnowledge3

Fair enough. It's hard to tell intent on when reading text. I just assumed you were coming at me like Lazy88.

However, finding a few VFX screenshots that somewhat match the videos does not PROVE anything. Sure, they can help form an opinion, but it does not flat out prove anything. Only once all the source files can be found or the hoaxer comes forward, then that would ACTUALLY prove they are fake. Until then, you can form your own opinion on whether the videos are real or fake based on the facts on the table.

Based on the logic the debunkers are using here, couldn't you technically "debunk" any video on the internet?
This is the exact same thing that was done when the Tic Tac videos were released on this site back in the day.

a reply to: b0kal0ka

FWIW...I actually believe the Tic Tac videos really are an unexplained phenomenon. Much more credible sources, and much more difficult to explain. In fact, I don't believe they even can be fully explained at present.

Had these been the topic of the OP, these past (2) pages would have been a completely different discussion.

a reply to: Flyingclaydisk

Right, so you only believe the stuff the government says is real? Well guess what, the Tic Tac belongs to the military as well as those orbs. But my point is that if the debunkers really wanted to, they could find some VFX asset out there that looks like one of the frames in the Tic Tac video and claim that its been debunked. The logic just doesn't make sense.

All these Ufologists out there love to claim the technology we're seeing is too advanced for humans to understand but it's a flat out lie. We've reversed this UFO technology already and we've been weaponizing it ever since. This is all feeding perfectly into to Project Bluebeam.

a reply to: Flyingclaydisk

Funny people that are “debunkers” questioned the Tic Tac videos and confirmed by all evidence at hand the videos are from actual military systems for lack of a better term. Don’t let anyone tell you otherwise for a blatantly false and straw man argument. But the “debunkers” poked and tested, and came to their own conclusions. Has nothing to do with what the government told them. Oddly. I’m not sure how much the military has officially confirmed the leaked videos.

Where the same debunkers for the MH370 videos didn’t just accept the videos, but poke and tested. They came up with numerous proofs the MH370 videos were poorly rendered CGI. Where other people blindly accept the MH370 videos on nothing but fait.

Funny you question people like b0kal0ka, they get self righteous. Throw out things like “you believe because the government told you.” That’s used lots in flat earth. Where “debunkers” actually accept and want to be questioning. The contrast is very revealing.

a reply to: b0kal0ka

In another thread it was shown why people don’t debate people like you. By omission and cherry picking you create blatantly false arguments. Most people have the common sense not to deal with people that only debate out of dishonesty and selling faith.

a reply to: Lazy88

Tell me where I've cherry picked or where I created a false argument

originally posted by: b0kal0ka
a reply to: Lazy88

Tell me where I've cherry picked or where I created a false argument

😂😂😂😂😂

originally posted by: b0kal0ka
a reply to: Lazy88

dude, stop relying on what other people tell

Vs you that uses blandly false arguments by omission, cherry picking, or using sources that right out lie.

😂😂😂😂

Dude. Do you understand that a website archive has nothing to do with the actual source file and its existence.

It’s no different when I post photos from my phone on the internet three or four years after I took them and have them stored.

Again. Jonas De Ro who took the picture confirmed it’s from 2012. The source files dated 2012 were provided.

This goes through the process of authenticating the source file you wanted.

Authenticating the cloud photos supplied by Jonas De Ro

www.reddit.com...

You have Jonas De Ro, Mick West, and others confirming the age and authenticity of the source file used as stock background.

And that’s only one aspect of the argument.

There is still the stock footage of the explosion ran through a filter.

The clouds are unrealistically static for supposedly a satellite having to change perspective and focus for a moving passenger jet.

The contrails move and jump around unrealistically in relation to the jet.


You faith is in two debunked video concerning MH370 proven to be poorly rendered CGI. This is a religion to you like flat earth is to flat earthers.

a reply to: Lazy88

Let me know when you're ready to disprove all the other evidence I've provided.

ATS 101; remember every story has multiple angles on it therefore making multiple threads about it of legitimate interest. Especially when your own search engine is hardly optimal every story deserves a couple chances at exposure. I have no opinion on MH aside from feeling like it ended up in Diego Garcia and memory holed by the military.

a reply to: Asktheanimals

Appreciate your support. That's how I always remembered this site being.

And I think you're on to something with Diego Garcia. Assuming the plane wasn't vaporized, I believe that's where it ultimately ended up.

a reply to: Asktheanimals

ADG who would have thought!
Now I'll be able to sleep at night thank you

a reply to: Skinnerbot

Diego Garcia is absolutely fascinating