It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
"You consistently said over and over the word ‘oppression,’ and every time that you said it, it was almost as if I was hearing nails on a chalkboard, because it seems like you don't understand the definition of ‘oppression,’ And I'd ask you to just refer to Google to help you out. Oppression is the prolonged cruel or unjust treatment or control. That is the definition of oppression," she said. "And so, as I sit here as a Black woman who practiced civil rights, let me tell you the reason that my colleagues wanted to make sure you understood the same Black history that your side of the aisle wants to delete out of classrooms is because you can then misuse words like ‘oppression.’"
originally posted by: TzarChasm
a reply to: network dude
I'm probably using sloppy jargon here but in my point of view (arguing subjectively and not factually) racism is largely administrative rather than social. What I mean by that is discrimination has to be a policy, an act of management, not a pedestrian expression of preference or cultural ignorance. The problem we have now is that any inconvenience is scrutinized as a symptom of racism despite having no correlation to policy or the ethnic properties of the plaintiff, which is intellectually lazy and absurd. But we've come to expect lazy and absurd from the DEI subscribers.
originally posted by: network dude
... But I have to run, ... to use the bathroom of my choice.