posted on Nov, 14 2024 @ 11:12 PM
He seems to be optimistic on how things might get better with Kennedy in charge.
I would be happy to work with Kennedy with possible ways to help to fix some things I know quite a bit about. But I have no degrees and just read
research so I would not count on anyone wanting my knowledge. And of course, advising someone would bring down a lot of businesses trying to
discredit me and even sue me....so I am glad I am not qualified officially for even advising him. My knowledge comes from reading and evaluating
research and conclusions from some of the best research institutes in the world. Evidence that the present health agencies in this country seem to be
ignoring and not accepting.
Heck, I'd work for free, I am not interested in getting rich, my name is Richard, I am already Rich, but not really wealthy. There seems to be too
much money to be made in healthcare in the USA, we use the sign of Hermes which is the sign of commerce for our health industry. I do a lot of
reading of European medicine and research, and it seems to be less plagued with profiteering. But even though I do do research under WHO, I do not
trust that organization either....seems like that organization also has some high ranking officials with big heads too that want complete power over
the populations like we have here in America.
I hope that Kennedy helps to straighten out things so we have a better and less stressful future. I am not against medical treatments, I think they
are necessary, but we have to re-evaluate the chemistry we are allowing and promoting in foods and water and teach people more about how to keep from
getting sick instead of having them get sick and then need medical treatment.
I could definitely have good conversations with some of the big research groups, I now speak their language fairly well, but also, there are a lot of
the heads of those groups that have to alter results to gain funding to fund their research, we need them, but I can see the reason some research is
misinterpretted because they have to have money to make a living and their conclusions need to somewhat match what the people paying them want lots of
time. Otherwise they will lose future research grants if they go against the grain.