It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Hypntick
a reply to: KrustyKrab
Unless it's got quantum computing in mind it won't be secure. Saw an article the other day that researchers managed to break RSA encryption, this was only a 50 bit encryption, not the 1024 or 2048 typically used, but give it a few years. There's no such thing as a hack proof system as all of these systems rely on one very critical vulnerability, the human component.
originally posted by: GENERAL EYES
a reply to: Annee
Full blown GATTACA.
It might be more complicated than robotics perfecting such a system.
A lot of folks don't like the thought of their genetic being used by others.
originally posted by: Annee
I remember back in the early 60’s when I was a keypuncher. My entire floor was the computer and they hand wired (plugged) the motherboards.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: Hypntick
a reply to: Annee
As inconvenient as it may be for you, cyber security will never be able to keep up. They can't even secure the voting machines, an online portal would be exponentially more difficult to secure.
Proof & link on compromised voting machines.
originally posted by: theatreboy
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: Hypntick
a reply to: Annee
As inconvenient as it may be for you, cyber security will never be able to keep up. They can't even secure the voting machines, an online portal would be exponentially more difficult to secure.
Proof & link on compromised voting machines.
An article from 2004. Dems claiming diebold machines in Ohio changed votes to Bush.
inthesetimes.com...
Bet if i looked, i would find a few posts of you complaining about a stolen election around the same time....
Yeah, that’s what I was saying, no matter what they do there’s always a back way in. Hack proof doesn’t exist.
originally posted by: Hypntick
a reply to: KrustyKrab
Unless it's got quantum computing in mind it won't be secure. Saw an article the other day that researchers managed to break RSA encryption, this was only a 50 bit encryption, not the 1024 or 2048 typically used, but give it a few years. There's no such thing as a hack proof system as all of these systems rely on one very critical vulnerability, the human component.
Correct, I remember reading about that “option”. The fact that the computers can be connected to the internet is disturbing to me even though they say it’s a closed system in a sense, technically it’s not. There’s also little to no regulation and oversight of the software company or of Dominion themselves. All possible problematic issues.
originally posted by: Lumenari
originally posted by: Hypntick
a reply to: KrustyKrab
Unless it's got quantum computing in mind it won't be secure. Saw an article the other day that researchers managed to break RSA encryption, this was only a 50 bit encryption, not the 1024 or 2048 typically used, but give it a few years. There's no such thing as a hack proof system as all of these systems rely on one very critical vulnerability, the human component.
Weighted voting on Dominion systems is not considered a "hack".
It was written into the code on purpose.
It is a feature.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: theatreboy
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: Hypntick
a reply to: Annee
As inconvenient as it may be for you, cyber security will never be able to keep up. They can't even secure the voting machines, an online portal would be exponentially more difficult to secure.
Proof & link on compromised voting machines.
An article from 2004. Dems claiming diebold machines in Ohio changed votes to Bush.
inthesetimes.com...
Bet if i looked, i would find a few posts of you complaining about a stolen election around the same time....
I was closely following Black Box Voting.
However, after being here for 17 years — very rarely (if ever) does any complaint/conspiracy come to proven fruition.
originally posted by: theatreboy
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: Hypntick
a reply to: Annee
As inconvenient as it may be for you, cyber security will never be able to keep up. They can't even secure the voting machines, an online portal would be exponentially more difficult to secure.
Proof & link on compromised voting machines.
An article from 2004. Dems claiming diebold machines in Ohio changed votes to Bush.
inthesetimes.com...
Bet if i looked, i would find a few posts of you complaining about a stolen election around the same time....
originally posted by: KrustyKrab
Correct, I remember reading about that “option”. The fact that the computers can be connected to the internet is disturbing to me even though they say it’s a closed system in a sense, technically it’s not. There’s also little to no regulation and oversight of the software company or of Dominion themselves. All possible problematic issues.
originally posted by: Lumenari
originally posted by: Hypntick
a reply to: KrustyKrab
Unless it's got quantum computing in mind it won't be secure. Saw an article the other day that researchers managed to break RSA encryption, this was only a 50 bit encryption, not the 1024 or 2048 typically used, but give it a few years. There's no such thing as a hack proof system as all of these systems rely on one very critical vulnerability, the human component.
Weighted voting on Dominion systems is not considered a "hack".
It was written into the code on purpose.
It is a feature.
Republicans are frustrated by long waits as voters want to vote early in person by mail in Bucks County.
Republican officials in Bucks County are urging election officials to come up with a plan to ensure that each voter who wants to cast their mail ballot in-person is able to before the state’s deadline to request a mail ballot at 5 p.m. Tuesday.
In a Sunday letter to county officials, U.S. Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick and several GOP members of the Pennsylvania General Assembly argued that the county had disenfranchised voters on Saturday when voters who arrived to request a mail ballot at the Doylestown election office were turned away two hours before the county office offering the service was set to close.
“This incident has sent shockwaves throughout our community and is causing individuals to lose faith in our electoral system,” the statement said.
BREAKING - Reports are emerging of voters being pushed out of line by individuals claiming to be election officials, after waiting hours in long lines across Pennsylvania counties.
It’s being reported that Democrats, identifying as “election officials,” are instructing voters to leave.
In Bucks County, eyewitnesses claim these impersonators are wearing fake badges, creating confusion among voters.
They are hiding the evidence of absentee mail-in ballot fraud - by not allowing the evidence to be created in the first place. Here's how and what changed:
You can't get the absentee mail-in vote ballot images from the USPS because they are not sending them to the central sorting facilities!
Normally, you mail a letter to someone or a bill goes out, it goes to your local post office, then it gets to a central sorting facility. Wisconsin for example has six: Madison, Milwaukee, Oak Creek, Green Bay, N. Illinois and Eagan MN that sorts/handles all mail.
Even if mailed to your neighbor 1 house over, that is how the system works.