Read Jack Smith’s unsealed redacted motion on Trump presidential immunity

a reply to: spacedoubt

Given her track record, how do you believe your Queen will handle international conflict? Let's say, she meets with Putin? Xi? How about Kim Jung Un?

Again, given her history and knowing how she got into politics, how do YOU believe she will take care of these leaders?

What do you think those leaders expect from Kamala?

I'll let you think about that one.

Here's a hint: it's exactly what those same leaders will expect from the rest of us.

Former US Attorney Honig was just interviewed on CNN.
CNN got a quote from Hilary Clinton about the election inference as well.
It’s a good watch….

A CNN legal analyst just DESTROYED Jack Smith and Judge Chutkan for what appears to be political motivation in releasing the 165-page brief.

A legal analyst, who has handled thousands of cases, stated that he has NEVER witnessed such an occurrence before. He also pointed out that this action might go against the spirit, and possibly the letter, of DOJ policy. Historically, the DOJ avoids involvement in activities that could influence an election, with the notable exception of the Hunter Biden laptop story in 2020.

Moreover, this action was taken within 45 days of one of the most significant elections in American history, which flips the usual procedure.

You know when CNN provides a platform for someone challenging the views of party elites like Hillary Clinton, that means they’re panicking!

x.com...

So, where is the apology?

Link

The Justice Department and special counsel Jack Smith's office are engaged in active discussions about how to wind down the ongoing federal prosecutions against President-elect Donald Trump, according to two people familiar with the talks. At the center of the discussions is the Justice Department's longstanding policy against prosecuting a sitting president and the need to enable a smooth transition to a second term in the White House for Trump, the sources said. Regulations governing the special counsel dictate that the upper echelons of the Justice Department, including possibly Attorney General Merrick Garland, are to be consulted on major decisions in an investigation overseen by a special counsel. Smith's office declined to comment.

If it was real you would still move forward. Make a precedent. So, where does this also leave all of the 1/6 cases and accusations?

There is only one reason that the DoJ is trying to shut these charges before Trump takes office.
They are looking to bury/destory evidence of the coordination to use the legal system to interfere in the election and corrupt the justice system.

On another note the NY state case - the most bogus of them all - is due for sentencing later this month.
There is a hearing next Tuesday for the corrupt judge Merchan to decide whether to drop the case entirely.
There is some speculation that he will move ahead and Trump will be sentenced to jail later in the month, BUT have the sentence start after he leaves office. If they do that, all hell will break loose.