A small potential issue with Kamala.

Hundreds of years ago, the Crimean Khanate captured people in Central Europe and sold them to the Ottoman Empire. The Ottomans' Barbary States allies distributed the slaves throughout the slaving world.

Various crackdowns on piracy and slave exportation disrupted the system. The personnel may have formed underground networks for human trafficking. They may have stretched from Central Europe and Crimea through the Mediterranean and into Africa and the United States.

Ms. Harris looks a bit like people from that route: Central Europeans with some Turkic or Tartar or Mongolian roots, mobsters with Mediterranean roots, and Gaddaffi. (The Crimean Khanate was a state created by descenants of the invasion of Europe by the Mongolian Empire.)

One hopes she's not connected to a family or organization of traffickers.

Are you saying Kamala was in "Crocodile Dundee" if so it's pretty far down the list of potential issues

A DNA test would show she is 50%+ Caucasian ⚔️

originally posted by: xuenchen
A DNA test would show she is 50%+ Caucasian ⚔️

Im not sure thats relevant to anything but an extremely low percentage of people. It's not her ancestry but her actions and antics it's not ner lineage it's her lunacy

a reply to: Solvedit

Is there any evidence she is a descendent of Zaporozhian Cossacks? ☠️

WTH???? That's like saying evey person who is ont blak should pay anyone who is because decades ago blak people wer slaves! Or maybe we should hate on any decendants of someone who committed a crime, no matter how many hundreds of years have passed.

originally posted by: nugget1
WTH???? That's like saying evey person who is ont blak should pay anyone who is because decades ago blak people wer slaves! Or maybe we should hate on any decendants of someone who committed a crime, no matter how many hundreds of years have passed.

Please consider reading the OP more carefully.

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: Solvedit
Is there any evidence she is a descendent of Zaporozhian Cossacks? ☠️

I have no evidence of any kind. I just think she looks like the people I mentioned. If you look at some faces maybe you will find a resemblance.

Why do you ask?

originally posted by: Solvedit

originally posted by: nugget1
WTH???? That's like saying evey person who is ont blak should pay anyone who is because decades ago blak people wer slaves! Or maybe we should hate on any decendants of someone who committed a crime, no matter how many hundreds of years have passed.

Please consider reading the OP more carefully.

One hopes she's not connected to a family or organization of traffickers.

WTF? Who cares if she is a many generations removed decendant? Even if she' was/is a direct decendant WTH does that have to do with her personally? Danm, man!

Maybe YOU are connected to some truly gruesome characters in your distant past; maybe a close realtion to Epstein, Should we then judge you by who you are, or the actions of nefarious relatives?

originally posted by: nugget1
Maybe YOU are connected to some truly gruesome characters in your distant past; maybe a close realtion to Epstein, Should we then judge you by who you are, or the actions of nefarious relatives?

If I ran for president, don't you think it would bear looking into?

You do know trafficking has continuously been a thing, right? How can you talk like it's centuries ago? The personnel of the alliance I spoke of probably moved underground and formed criminal networks of trafficking after the Crimean war and various crackdowns on piracy and slave exportation.

The Soviet Union and the Nazi regime may have been started in part by people with mob connections.

The issue is, if a candidate's connected to trafficking, they may want to take it closer to legit. They may be thinking of finding ways of moving us closer to trafficking and the Ottoman empire.

Part of their support may come from the like-minded who may want to see trafficking legitimized.

Economic empowerment moves people closer to being able to impose penalties for noncompliance.

You might wind up Lazarus if you refuse to be Magdalene.

a reply to: Solvedit

a reply to: Solvedit

If you can judge a wise man
By the color of his skin
Then mister you're a better man than I.

Livin' on the Edge by Aerosmith

I think that applies to faces also. I also don't think anyone can do it.

a reply to: Solvedit

Kamala's physical appearance or genealogy does not matter.

Her actions ( and inactions) is what she must be judged on.

Slept her way up the Democrat party = WHORE

WHORE 2024
Yay !!

a reply to: Solvedit

Ah, you have determined that she is genetically made entirely out of an amalgam of concrete and plasticene!

It explains everything.

Her surprising propensity for being rolled into 'snakes', and her abrasiveness when rubbed up the wrong way.

I think Trump is entirely gold leaf on custard.

Shiny, but ultimately nearly worthless and shapeless. A vacuum to the livelihood of others.

Thoughts?



Either are entirely apt for running a country (into a wall).

Splat!

But who is the lesser of two weevils?

originally posted by: BeyondKnowledge3
a reply to: Solvedit

If you can judge a wise man

Who said anything about judge? We have a little circumstantial evidence. It is time to investigate, not judge.

You know, though, you can judge whether a person belongs to a race, by their appearance and color, since race means nothing but appearance. In other words, she may be lying. Honesty counts.

Besides, if we ever see the brave new world she wants to build, are we all going to have to choose between being honest or getting promoted by falsifying heritage?

originally posted by: Tolkien
a reply to: Solvedit

Kamala's physical appearance or genealogy does not matter.

They do matter because she's made them an issue. She may be lying about being Indian.

She may have hoped she could pass for being from south of the Himalayas instead of north because her other side was dark enough.

Her actions ( and inactions) is what she must be judged on.

Slept her way up the Democrat party = WHORE

It's not just a merit issue.

People claim they love the Sexual Revolution, but they don't love it, they love the upward mobility they can get by getting to know how to sound and act like a smart person, and maybe forming sinful rapports to help cheat on exams.

They seem to rather resent feeling like a whore for knowledge.

It almost seems sometimes as if they'd rather prefer it all to be on their terms.

What if someone like that became the president?

There probably won't be a system of laws that let her put you in a camp that says "Arbeit Macht Frei" over the gate.

But what if it just gets easier to sideline people unless they participate in empowering her constituents? What if court cases pertaining to trafficking get ignored? You know some of them feel we did the same sort of thing to them. Maybe even so.