It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
These writings corroborate passages from the Hebrew Bible, as the Second Book of Kings mentions that Jehoram is the son of an Israelite king, Ahab, by his Phoenician wife Jezebel. The likely candidate for having erected the stele, according to the Hebrew Bible, is Hazael, king of Aram-Damascus, whose language would have been Old Aramaic. He is mentioned in 2 Kings 12:17-18 as having conquered Israel-Samaria but not Jerusalem.
the authors of this new study concluded that, no, the city had indeed been burned down, as the bricks showed evidence of firing temperatures compatible with conflagration rather than a kiln. This new determination is consistent with the Bible’s account of Hazael overtaking Gath.
originally posted by: Coelacanth55
are you going somewhere with this?
there is archaeological evidence for some of this
en.wikipedia.org...#:
These writings corroborate passages from the Hebrew Bible, as the Second Book of Kings mentions that Jehoram is the son of an Israelite king, Ahab, by his Phoenician wife Jezebel. The likely candidate for having erected the stele, according to the Hebrew Bible, is Hazael, king of Aram-Damascus, whose language would have been Old Aramaic. He is mentioned in 2 Kings 12:17-18 as having conquered Israel-Samaria but not Jerusalem.
answersingenesis.org...
the authors of this new study concluded that, no, the city had indeed been burned down, as the bricks showed evidence of firing temperatures compatible with conflagration rather than a kiln. This new determination is consistent with the Bible’s account of Hazael overtaking Gath.