posted on Jun, 3 2024 @ 11:58 PM
Hi ATS,
I appreciate that this thread is a bit difficult to categorise, but I’m going to put it in the ‘Conspiracies in Religion’ forum because the
central premise is that the world we see is distorted by a fallen god who was permitted influence over the world, but not absolute control. That
influence, in distorting the world, hugely interfered with any possibility of a true perception of God that Humanity would otherwise have possessed
down through the ages.
I was going to put a bunch of photos in the thread to make it look interesting, but then I realised I’m not writing for Time Magazine, this is
serious journalism here.
Read through the whole thing, I dare you. My sincere thanks if you make it to the end.
How does a photographer take long-exposure photos of Polaris-centred star trails? Either the universe is spinning around him with Polaris at the
centre (we are assured by scientist-priests this is not the case) or he himself is spinning beneath Polaris, the central polar star which can be seen
from everywhere on Earth. His middle axis would have to align with the middle axis of the Earth’s supposed axis, running from North to South – so
a person standing on the equator could not hope to produce star trail photographs around Polaris because he is flying around at 1600km/h tilted at an
angle, warping his perspective horribly. Furthermore, the Southern ‘hemisphere’ star formation Crux which is seen as the nearest equivalent to
the pole star phenomenon in the Northern ‘hemisphere’ does not sit centrally in line with a supposed southern celestial pole, and neither can it
be seen with star trails forming around it from the whole Earth in the same way that Polaris can – if not, why not? Surely what goes for one pole
at all times & in all seasons must go for the other pole at all times & in all seasons? Furthermore, at mid-latitudes the only spherical star
trails would be seen to move horizontally across the sky! Anyway. Is the Earth itself spinning to produce star trail photographs, the explanation we
are given by the scientist-priests? No, that can’t be right either. Because after an 180° degree partial orbit around the Sun, Polaris would be
millions of kilometres out of alignment with the Earth's actual North Pole.. And so we return to the original suggestion, and for many additional
reasons not covered in the scope of this OP, we can ultimately determine that indeed, the sky above our heads is what is revolving around the North
Star, Polaris, which is allegedly two quadrillion miles away from us, and itself does not rotate but stays perfectly fixed, the pin at the
centre of the pin-wheel; year after year, decade after decade, century after century, millennium after millennium, aeon after aeon. For the Earth’s
manic wobbling, spinning, revolving, spiralling & shooting motions through ‘space’ to be feasible, then from two quadrillion miles away, Polaris
would have to be mirroring, in real time, the wobbling, spinning, revolving, spiralling & shooting movements that the Earth is making through the
universe in the course of each year, to stay centred above the North Pole, as Earth allegedly revolves around itself, the Sun, the galaxy & the
universe as a whole. And not only does this relate to Polaris, but to each & every other star too. This is because all stars are allegedly at varying
distances from the Earth, according to scientist-priests, and therefore as the Earth moves in the various ways we are told it does, the stars MUST
therefore move out of place due to our perspective – both relative to each other & relative to us here on the Earth as well. Yet somehow, the
Zodiac asterisms have remained exactly the same throughout all time after at least seven millennia of the allegedly manic motions of the Earth through
‘space’. Sheer nonsense. The only way that the stars could maintain their fixed positions relative to each other, would be if the Earth is a
fixed planar expanse with the ‘Sky’ (the visible universe) being a spherical shell which is rotating around the Earth plane, showing a greater or
lesser part of its total expanse depending on where, when & how you view it.
To introduce this thread more broadly, I present the following comments:
I thoroughly expect the response to be brutal in the main, but I just want to get the thread up so it can be looked at by people smarter than me who
can discern the general arguments I’m attempting to present, then beginning to see their way through the ninety years of propaganda since Professor
Auguste Piccard descended from the seminal flight in a capsule & balloon rig he had designed himself, as he first described the Earth from 55,000
feet, in the stratosphere, higher than any man had ever hone before, as “flat, with a slightly upturned edge”. These smart people I’m thinking
of will then recognise that we do not live on a magic spinning ball in a cold, impersonal, steel-edged & mechanistic universe that cares naught for us
& our problems, but instead we have been lied to on a dramatic scale, and at a fundamentally & truly cosmic level, someone has messed with our
environment too. Why do I care about this situation anyway? Surely Flat Earth theories are bunk which are only parroted by lunatics..? Well, it’s
actually because I'm sick of people being dissuaded by disingenuous sophistry & technological manipulation of image data by the guardians of astral
knowledge in powerful ‘scientific’ institutions from believing that we as sentient Humanity are wondrously blessed with the ability to get to know
in person (in some small way) our infinite, loving & beneficent Creator God, who formed us in our mother’s womb & constructed the realm we live in,
furnished it with incredible features & rules of operation, and filled it with all the wonders of vast Nature for us to enjoy & benefit from in this
life, with a true homecoming to the divine Paradise promised when we reach the end of our material lives.
By understanding the world in the right context, we are gifted with sure knowledge; a direct & unassailable path to an awareness of God which is not
in any way confusing or scary, because His existence is as matter-of-fact as apple pie. As it happens, we're currently occupying the tail end of the
so-called 'post-truth' period of the burgeoning age of enlightenment which began in the 1500s-1600s. After that comes a choice: Do we permit that
the fiends who run the demonic secret society which has lied to us in an organised, systematic, despicable way for over five hundred years, even back
to Babylon & further, to antediluvian times, continue to lie to us right up until the time of the seemingly inevitable Apocalypse (literally, 'the
unveiling'), or are we prepared to accept a true & righteous 'vaccine' against the harmful pathogenic scum responsible for our mass delusion? As
you will no doubt understand, this will be the only vaccine developed in the last few years which has our best interests at heart.
Continued...