It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: KKLOCO
a reply to: pianopraze
Too bad they didn’t use one of the many drones oil rigs have on hand to get a closer look.
originally posted by: lilzazz
Any one bother to research lights being used by commercial fisherman to attract fish.
I did....
www.researchgate.net...
I know the doom porn alien invasion is a popular go to here on this forum; invariably it's a more mundane answer.
originally posted by: lilzazz
Plankton perhaps...
originally posted by: Ophiuchus1
The dialogue sounds possibly hoaxie to fit the scene…imo…to what could be a regular operation.
originally posted by: AlexandrosOMegas
Well, at the risk of being unpopular, these are seamen (tee hee) who know their stuff too and spend their entire working lives seeing mundane things and we should trust them to identify something strange.
They may speak another language, but they are just as intelligent as we are.
originally posted by: DaydreamerX
To me this reminds of Fravor tic tac encounter...
"..Two U.S. navy fighter pilots say they were investigating a sensor anomaly off the coast of San Diego in 2004 when they saw something they couldn’t explain: a churning patch of white water on the ocean’s surface and a “Tic Tac looking object” that appeared to be hovering without propulsion.
originally posted by: ArMaP
originally posted by: DaydreamerX
To me this reminds of Fravor tic tac encounter...
"..Two U.S. navy fighter pilots say they were investigating a sensor anomaly off the coast of San Diego in 2004 when they saw something they couldn’t explain: a churning patch of white water on the ocean’s surface and a “Tic Tac looking object” that appeared to be hovering without propulsion.
As far as I understand it, the expression "white water" is used as meaning agitated water, water with foam, usually because of it being shallow.
But, obviously, I may be wrong.