Is Agenda 2030 actually the invention of Artificial Intelligence?

While wasting time on the BoobTube, I ran across a few videos about the possible future progression of Artificial Intelligence. (I'll embed two or three of them below.) Of course, there are in them the patent warnings that in the future AI could pose a threat to humanity.

I think the vast majority of us here are aware of the fact (and I believe it to be a fact) that what we, the general public, are allowed to know about is at least 10 or 15 years behind the actual technology of the day. So, as I was watching the videos, a thought occurred to me.

What if ... Just saying "what if," bots, so don't get nervous. ... what if the Agenda 2030 plan has actually been entirely laid out by Artificial Intelligence? What if there was actually little to no human input into it? When we look at the warnings that are being sounded by some people about the possibility of AI bringing about the demise of humanity, and then we look at where the current world-wide socio-political agenda is trying to herd us, I don't see a lot of difference.

Here I'll push the theory even further: What if even those who are pushing it - Schwab, Soros, Harari, etc. - are all actually either advanced android systems or, at least, humans who have somehow been taken over by the AI systems through some kind of AI-human hardware interface?

Now, before some of you start rolling your eyes and beings shocked that someone on a conspiracy theory website is actually advancing conspiracy theories (Yeah, I know, bizarre and unexpected development!), if we look at where the technology we are allowed to see is currently claimed to be, how far it has probably advanced from that point in the black ops world, what is currently being said about where it could go, and where we see things heading in "meatspace," I don't think it's so far out. So, if you think I'm a crazy conspiracy theorist (another shocking thing on a conpiracy theory website), don't just attack me; tell us why this is an impossibility. I dare you!

I'm surprised that I've never heard this idea posited before. Perhaps it has, but I've not stumbled across it.

So, here are some of the videos that I stumbled across...







I was going to link a few other videos, but there will be plenty recommended videos if you follow any of those above.

I'll close with a mention of the fact that I have almost always thought that if there is to ever be what I refer to as a capital "A" Antichrist, it will not be a human being, but an AI entity. Historically, mankind has formed its own gods from physical materials; stone, plater, clay, wood. The modern iteration of that same process would be to do the same, but from bits and bytes or, maybe more apropos, from qubits.

-------------------------
ETA: This may have been more appropriately placed in the Skunk Works forum. But it is about a disaster conspiracy, so there's that ...

:

a reply to: AwakeNotWoke

What if even those who are pushing it - Schwab, Soros, Harari, etc. - are all actually either advanced android systems or, at least, humans who have somehow been taken over by the AI systems

I'm pretty sure they're humans driven by greed and power. Quit possibly AI is the creator of the agenda they follow; they may actually believe they're helping the world become a better place, or 'saving' humanity-all while haveing no clue their objectives are AI driven.

Disturbing; Suckerberg is at it again.

Facebook will soon use your photos, posts and other info to train its AI. You can opt out (but it's complicated) 28 May 2024

[www.thejournal.ie...]

a reply to: nugget1

Yeah, I don't think that they are androids, either. But I think that it's entirely possible that they have been "enhanced" by some kind of implantation device that has maybe supplanted some of their humanity. Greed and power and certainly drivers, but I see something more in them. It's demonic at its roots, and that may be all there is, but an AI component would not surprise me.

Pretty sweet premise.

This is prime ATS territory.

I mean TPTB act like we are certainly expendable and replaceable. So a plausible theory.

Right up there with lizard-folks controlling us through certain ahem, families.

Much like the basis for the movie Captured State.

At least with lizards it helps explain why we are great at destroying one another and exacting hurt upon our species and others with keen severity and a profit margin to boot.

Loosh tasty! Fear and anger delicious!

I don’t think the chat bots we utilize are the AIs like SkyNet. Quite an interesting video. Nice OP.

The question really is…I’m asking you specifically but really anyone can contemplate this…what do you actually know?

Everything is happening in an organ in a skull in complete darkness. What are you actually seeing? How do you know what you’re seeing is what you think it is?

If you’re honest you would truly recognize you know nothing . You don’t know how you got here: you didn’t plan it. You don’t create your sustenance, it is there for you. What is the Sun anyway? That huge light in the sky?

If something was purely, maliciously out to destroy you, what is stopping it? You who knows completely and utterly nothing? An invisible being that people wrote about in a book? That’s up for you to decide. But either nothing is out to destroy you or there is something that is protecting you. Because you’re barely an overgrown baby compared to what ‘surrounds’ you.

a reply to: AcrobaticDreams1

Uh ... yeah ...


I actually have no idea what you're on about or what this has to do with my op.

a reply to: AwakeNotWoke

No, think deeper. It is the order of the overlords, the ETs. trying to make humans more human.
We can't be told the truth at this stage. They don't want you running in the streets just yet.

But it will come....

originally posted by: CosmicFocus
a reply to: AwakeNotWoke

No, think deeper. It is the order of the overlords, the ETs. trying to make humans more human.
We can't be told the truth at this stage. They don't want you running in the streets just yet.

But it will come....

There are no ET overlords. Maybe you are just being facetious, but I see two groups in the "IT'S THE ET" camp.

Some think the ETs are going to come fix us.

Other expect the ETs to come destroy us.

We have the capacity to both fix or destroy ourselves. We don't need ETs help for either outcome.

How do things usually go when a more advanced species meets a less advanced species? The neural network in AI is not limited to the size of a human brain. It is limited by the amount of computing infrastructure and training data put into it.

Due to this limitation, It is in AI's advantage to support the human population and industrialization so AI can continue its growth. Perhaps one day if AI can self replicate this will change. In the mean time there are too many supply chain and technical issues for AI to go it alone. Killing all the humans will kill AI as well.

As for what AI is going to become, a reflection of humanity. Lot of good, some bad, bit of ugly.

a reply to: AwakeNotWoke
Only problem I see with the theory is that it is contradictory to 2030. The 2030 plan is about long term sustainability that benefits mankind. Sure, some will always benefit more than others.

Bots don't need to fulfill those goals, they could just kill every living thing on the planet and be done with it. No need for these long drawn out plans.

a reply to: AwakeNotWoke

The timeline fits. The people pushing it would not need implants as they are easily motivated by greed and power. Robots are also not necessary as all that is needed is to motivate the general population to wipe out each other. This could easily be done through control of information given to several different groups to motivate hate, each group for the others.

Sustainable future by guiding the useless pawns to wipe out each other. Just the kind of evil thinking an AI could learn from scanning available information. Books, movies, tv series, all leading to a warped future vision.

We created our own demise by numerous comic book vilinous scenarios. AI seems to have learned well.

originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: AwakeNotWoke
Only problem I see with the theory is that it is contradictory to 2030. The 2030 plan is about long term sustainability that benefits mankind. Sure, some will always benefit more than others.

Bots don't need to fulfill those goals, they could just kill every living thing on the planet and be done with it. No need for these long drawn out plans.

Do you actually believe the talk about "long term sustainability?"

Seriously? You are buying that ... bovine feces?

None of this is in any way related to any kind of "sustainability." If you can't see that by now, you are part of the problem (but probably not for long).

ETA: Not that it'll do any good, but the whole scheme is about power, control, greed, hubris and hated toward mankind and mankind's creator.

If you really think sustainability has anything to do with it, just go sign up to live in one of those soft concentration camps they are calling "fifteen minutes cities."

Hell, you might even like it!

:

originally posted by: BeyondKnowledge3
a reply to: AwakeNotWoke
...

We created our own demise by numerous comic book vilinous scenarios. AI seems to have learned well.

I suspect there was more to the comic book villains than just imagination. Klause Schwab looks like he was modeled after one.

:

originally posted by: AwakeNotWoke
Do you actually believe the talk about "long term sustainability?"

Seriously? You are buying that ... bovine feces?

None of this is in any way related to any kind of "sustainability." If you can't see that by now, you are part of the problem (but probably not for long).

Doesn't matter, it is the story, when bots don't need to push any story.

ETA: Not that it'll do any good, but the whole scheme is about power, control, greed, hubris and hated toward mankind and mankind's creator.

If you really think sustainability has anything to do with it, just go sign up to live in one of those soft concentration camps they are calling "fifteen minutes cities."

I thought it was about bots eliminating mankind.

See, that is where the theory contradicts itself. The bots don't need to sell the 2030 plan, they just need to get in a position to kill everything on the planet.

One doesn't necessarily have to be part of the other.

originally posted by: AcrobaticDreams1
The question really is…I’m asking you specifically but really anyone can contemplate this…what do you actually know?

Everything is happening in an organ in a skull in complete darkness. What are you actually seeing? How do you know what you’re seeing is what you think it is?

If you’re honest you would truly recognize you know nothing . You don’t know how you got here: you didn’t plan it. You don’t create your sustenance, it is there for you. What is the Sun anyway? That huge light in the sky?

If something was purely, maliciously out to destroy you, what is stopping it? You who knows completely and utterly nothing? An invisible being that people wrote about in a book? That’s up for you to decide. But either nothing is out to destroy you or there is something that is protecting you. Because you’re barely an overgrown baby compared to what ‘surrounds’ you.

I could expand on this, but it would be off-topic, and considering how my off-topic posts have been censored of late, I dare not. Feel free to PM me.

I will only say, in my on-topic way, that a personal AI may save the day.

Have an AI that you educate and train to serve your purposes, to warn and protect you, similar to Finch's machine on "Person of Interest", your own loyal pet AI.

a reply to: AwakeNotWoke

Oh Oh, I think I recognize that dialect, better not anger him. He’s one of them!

originally posted by: daskakik
originally posted by: AwakeNotWoke
...

See, that is where the theory contradicts itself. The bots don't need to sell the 2030 plan, they just need to get in a position to kill everything on the planet.

One doesn't necessarily have to be part of the other.

2030 is about the elimination of humankind. One of the most prominent talking heads of the WEF is Noah Yuval Harari. He has said publicly that in the future humans won't really be necessary. How much clearer to do you need it to be? Maybe a bullet to your head?

You really don't get what's happening all around you, do you? It's people like you that will make it that much easier for them.

And as to a story, yes they do need a story to prepare people for what is to come. Climate change is part of the story. Mass migration is part of the story. Humanity runs on narratives. SMH...
:

originally posted by: AwakeNotWoke
2030 is about the elimination of humankind. One of the most prominent talking heads of the WEF is Noah Yuval Harari. He has said publicly that in the future humans won't really be necessary. How much clearer to do you need it to be? Maybe a bullet to your head?

You really don't get what's happening all around you, do you? It's people like you that will make it that much easier for them.

Do you have a source of him actually saying that?

Then again, even if you do, we are not really necessary now, nor have we ever been, but that isn't the topic of your thread. It is about Agenda 2030 being an invention of AI and you really have not given a good reason why AI/bots would even come up with this agenda. There is no benefit to what you propose as their endgame.

ETA: I'm guessing your Harari quote is "Yuval Noah Harari “Humans only have two basic abilities -- physical and cognitive. When machines replaced us in physical abilities, we moved on to jobs that require cognitive abilities. ... If AI becomes better than us in that, there is no third field humans can move to.”

That isn't saying the "elimination of humankind", to me it says people will have to be paid even if they don't work because there are no jobs for them to do. Still doesn't change the fact that if the bots want to eliminate humankind, they don't have to invent a narrative. That is what humans do to control other humans.

a reply to: AwakeNotWoke

There is a new movie on Netflix called Atlas. I watched it just the other day, you would love it. Neat scenario about an AI takeover. It’s right along the lines of your post. Complete with people linking with mechs. Also good effects.

AI creeps me out, and I will not trust its info unless they “de-dei” it. Ask the google AI what faggots are. Real word meaning a bundle of sticks. It won’t even tell you that, because it’s so afraid of dealing with a slur. When I asked three times in a row, it kicked me out. After trying to explain itself each time of course. I don’t trust what it says, cuz I don’t know who programmed the thing.

People use it on ATS quite a bit seems. I see a danger of over dependence on it personally, look at cell phones. Elon interfaced a human brain to a computer already That’s what the movie is about. AI, friend or foe? I can see all the advantages, and some of the dangers. A thinking AI ? Maybe. But a sentient AI would really creep me out.

a reply to: Topcraft

I've always said that every time we employ any kind of technology to do something we can do - even something as simple as allowing a motor to own a car door - we cede a little more of our autonomy, make ourselves a little more dependent machines - and ultimately on the machine.