The verdict is in.

a reply to: Sookiechacha

You were the one standing in the hill of respecting the jury and courts. Now you're changing your position....


Again, so funny and entertaining.

a reply to: JinMI

Now you've stooped to lying. Pathetic.

I don't live in the 2-dimensional box you're created in your imagination.

ETA: Donald Trump still has access to his constitutional right to due process. He can appeal the merits of the case and the verdict to the appellate court, the NY Supreme Court and then even the US Supreme Court. Donald Trump's constitutional rights are still intact.

So again, are you suggesting that this is a case of constitutional rights and the interpretation of the US Constitution?

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: JinMI

Now you've stooped to lying. Pathetic.

I don't live in the 2-dimensional box you're created in your imagination.

You don't live in my imagination at all.

Your words and positions speak for themselves. Dont get mad at me for pointing them out.

a reply to: JinMI

What's you point?

Again, are you suggesting that this is a case of constitutional rights and the interpretation of the US Constitution?

a reply to: Sookiechacha

My point, as I previously explained, is that without an articulable underlying crime, there cannot exist a defense for it.

Did this escape you during the last few pages?

**** TIME OUT ****

This back and forth bickering stops now.


Thread Temp Closed.





CLOSED