It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: burritocat
I dont know how I feel about this. I dont think people should be forced to take the injection, thats just wrong. The government has no right to make anyone put # in their body that they dont want, and I thinks there good reasons not to want the injection. But what about people who want it? Its there right to decide what goes into their bodies. I think people should be given the choice, and I dont think the government has any right to punish you for your personal choice. Why cant people just choose?
originally posted by: ScarletDarkness
a reply to: IndieA
Sounds great, I'm all for it! I'm doubting this will happen though, as it's likely just more theater.
the Idaho House on Friday gave final passage to the “Coronavirus Pause Act,” sending legislation to the governor’s desk to impose a one-year ban on COVID-19 vaccine requirements by businesses, venues or employers in the state.
The House vote was 45-23 in favor of SB 1381, which had earlier passed the Senate.
The only exceptions allowed in the bill are for health care workers subject to federal law, existing contractual arrangements, and employees who are required to travel out of state or enter specific work areas where vaccines are required. Violations would be misdemeanors punishable by $1,000 fines.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
HOUSE BILL NO. 154
BY HEALTH AND WELFARE COMMITTEE
1 AN ACT
2 RELATING TO CRIMES; AMENDING CHAPTER 9, TITLE 18, IDAHO CODE, BY THE ADDITION
3 OF A NEW SECTION 18-926, IDAHO CODE, TO PROVIDE THAT PROVIDING OR ADMIN4 ISTERING AN MRNA VACCINE IS A MISDEMEANOR; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY
5 AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
6 Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Idaho:
7 SECTION 1. That Chapter 9, Title 18, Idaho Code, be, and the same is
8 hereby amended by the addition thereto of a NEW SECTION, to be known and des9 ignated as Section 18-926, Idaho Code, and to read as follows:
10 18-926. ADMINISTERING AN MRNA VACCINE. (1) Notwithstanding any other
11 provision of law, a person may not provide or administer a vaccine developed
12 using messenger ribonucleic acid technology for use in an individual or any
13 other mammal in this state.
14 (2) A person who violates this section is guilty of a misdemeanor.
15 SECTION 2. An emergency existing therefor, which emergency is hereby
16 declared to exist, this act shall be in full force and effect on and after
17 July 1, 2023.
originally posted by: VariedcodeSole
originally posted by: burritocat
I dont know how I feel about this. I dont think people should be forced to take the injection, thats just wrong. The government has no right to make anyone put # in their body that they dont want, and I thinks there good reasons not to want the injection. But what about people who want it? Its there right to decide what goes into their bodies. I think people should be given the choice, and I dont think the government has any right to punish you for your personal choice. Why cant people just choose?
Well, I'm in California and would like my rights restored but I would have to move to another state in order to do so, because California has no intention of unlocking their stranglehold.
Are you saying getting vaccinated is more important than the Bill of Rights?? Further, if I have to move to regain my rights, why can't people move to another state to get their precious shots??
They can just fly or drive out of Florida and get their fix that way. The important part of this is eliminating the root cause. You should praise this action because it'll settle the big questions that .gov is never going to answer. Don't you want accountability and responsibility, or is it just a free for all now?🙄
Ok, so you want your rights protected, but you want to step all over another persons right to choose?
originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: Vermilion
You mean the person that has degrees from Harvard and Tulane, finished their residency at one of the top hospitals in the country, was a vice-chair at Penn State's School of Medicine, and was Pennsylvania's Physician General and Secretary of Health?
You're right they have no qualifications for the job.
originally posted by: Disgusted123
I hope everyone here who thinks vaccines should be a choice feel the same way when it comes to women and their healthcare.
Otherwise, you look like hypocrites.
I think people should not be forced to get vaccines. I believe women can make their own abortions decisions. See, you don't have to be a hypocrite.
originally posted by: IndieA
Florida's Surgon General called for a halt to covid mRNA "vaccines" back in January.
Florida State Surgeon General Calls for Halt in the Use of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines
On December 6, 2023, State Surgeon General Dr. Joseph A. Ladapo sent a letter to the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Commissioner Dr. Robert M. Califf and Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Director Dr. Mandy Cohen regarding questions pertaining to the safety assessments and the exit disclaimer icondiscovery of billions of DNA fragments per dose of the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 mRNA vaccines.
The Surgeon General outlined concerns regarding nucleic acid contaminants in the approved Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, particularly in the presence of lipid nanoparticle complexes, and Simian Virus 40 (SV40) promoter/enhancer DNA. Lipid nanoparticles are an efficient vehicle for delivery of the mRNA in the COVID-19 vaccines into human cells and may therefore be an equally efficient vehicle for delivering contaminant DNA into human cells. The presence of SV40 promoter/enhancer DNA may also pose a unique and heightened risk of DNA integration into human cells.
originally posted by: VariedcodeSole
a reply to: budzprime69
Save it for soft headed people wih selective recollections. Here's a refresher in case Tik Tok has caused permanent damage:
m.youtube.com...
m.youtube.com...
m.youtube.com...
m.youtube.com...
Good question though: If Trump had won 2020, would there have been all the overwhelming compliance?
I don't think so. Trump had to lose to get shots in arms of people that would never touch it otherwise. They would have never gotten the numbers they did if Trump was steering the ship.
Not a chance.
California is experiencing a sustained mass Exodus of people. What's especially concerning for them is their cherished but severely dwindling tax base.
BREAKING: Yesterday, Arizona GOP passed the Ban the Jab resolution with 95.62% of the vote, declaring the shots biological and technological weapons and calling on the Gov to prohibit their distribution, and the AG to confiscate the vials and conduct a forensic analysis of their contents. 4 state senators, 5 school board members and 5 candidates from AZ have signed the pledge calling for the shots to be pulled off the market.
On behalf of the preservation of the human race, the 2024 Arizona Republican Party Presidential Nominating Convention Delegates call upon Governor Hobbs and the state legislature to prohibit the sale and distribution of Covid injections and all mRNA injections in Arizona, and for the Arizona Attorney General to immediately seize all Covid injections and mRNA injections in Arizona and perform a forensic analysis on these so-called "vaccines.""
Lawsuit Seeks to ‘Ban the Jab’ in Florida
originally posted by: burritocat
a reply to: VariedcodeSole
Im pretty sure banning the vaccine would create an exodus from Florida, since most people are fine with it, especially healthcare professionals. They will likely leave the state in an exodus if this became law, since they would no longer be able to do their jobs safely. There is already an exodus of teachers from there and will probably get worse. You speak of Californias dumb laws yet are ok with Floridas dumb laws. You are cool with dumb laws as long they enforce your personal beliefs on others. You are no better than the tyrants you claim to rail against.
Im pretty sure banning the vaccine would create an exodus from Florida