Candidate TRUMP Now Has Crazy Judge JUAN MERCHAN After Him - The Stormy Daniels Hush-Money Case.

originally posted by: charlyv
The moment it is realized that any judge has an agenda or attitude than is not a part of a non-biased legal process, the defendant should immediately be granted the right to have that judge removed from the case, and a new judge should be assigned.

The stupid situations that are continuously presented in our courtrooms are akin to a circus and demonstrates zero professionalism in most cases.

More is being learned about Judge Juan Merchan's financial support of Joe Biden's candidacy.

www.breitbart.com...

WHO could remove Merchan and replace him with a less-biased judge? Has anyone requested this?

originally posted by: charlyv
a reply to: Annee
That is just too cute. Religion itself is a bias, so can we probably say there is no way for a fair trial?

I do not find Bible Thumpers running the SCOTUS -- in any way cute.

Fortunately, they are not involved in the current court proceedings of Trump in NYC.

There is a legal process -- of which Trump has attempted to manipulate in every way shape and form.

But here we are today -- in court -- in front of a judge who is sticking to the law.

Trump's where he belongs.

originally posted by: WeMustCare
/

WHO could remove Merchan and replace him with a less-biased judge? Has anyone requested this?

Tell me where he hasn't stuck to law.

All this New York democrat stupidness is just fueling Trumps run to the White House.
Did you see the footage from the bodega he went to after court?
Tons of Trump love there.
No president has ever walked the streets there. That part of town is like the main hub of Dominican immigrants in the US. Trump knows the value of legal immigrants and they love him for it.
Meanwhile, Biden was in Pennsylvania and the room was small, and empty.
New York is in play.

a reply to: Vermilion

So if they love him the so much then it shouldn't be impossible for him to get a fair trial.

JUDGE MERCHAN ALLOWS PERSON WHO CELEBRATED TRUMP's 2020 LOSS, TO BE A JUROR.

Source: www.breitbart.com...

Regardless of how this trial concludes, Merchan has moved himself up another notch on the "Retribution" priority list.
😈

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: WeMustCare
/

WHO could remove Merchan and replace him with a less-biased judge? Has anyone requested this?

Tell me where he hasn't stuck to law.

"Bias" is a reason used for removing/replacing many judges in America. The judges with no underlying scheme to carry out, remove themselves.

The classified documents judge, Aileen Cannon, is carrying out a scheme to delay Donald Trump's trial, which is why she's openly displaying her bias...just like the New York Judges and New York Governor are exercising.

We'll see who wins in the end. It's the wild-wild-west!

originally posted by: WeMustCare

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: WeMustCare
/

WHO could remove Merchan and replace him with a less-biased judge? Has anyone requested this?

Tell me where he hasn't stuck to law.

"Bias" is a reason used for removing/replacing many judges in America. The judges with no underlying scheme to carry out, remove themselves.

The classified documents judge, Aileen Cannon, is carrying out a scheme to delay Donald Trump's trial, which is why she's openly displaying her bias...just like the New York Judges and New York Governor are exercising.

We'll see who wins in the end. It's the wild-wild-west!

Has he stuck to the law?

How surprising you give Judge Cannon a pass. s/

a reply to: Annee

Why is there no gag order in the Cannon case? All of the rest have one but why not there. Because it is being handled in a non-partisan way. A legal case is actually being presented, reviewed and ruled on.

The judge in this trial supports his political opponent financially. His kids. His wife. How can you order someone to not talk about a trial? I could see if he was actually saying I am going to kill people but he is simply using his 1st amendment right to free speech.

Unprecedented what is happening to Trump. No one deserves it. No one.

Has he fallen asleep yet today?

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: Vermilion

So if they love him the so much then it shouldn't be impossible for him to get a fair trial.

Unless Jury coaching firms come into play. 😀⚠️

a reply to: matafuchs

Cannon has her job because of Trump. She's already been slapped down by the 11th Circuit twice now for how she's ruled in this case.

She's the most partisan out of all the judges and the court record supports this claim.

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: matafuchs

Cannon has her job because of Trump. She's already been slapped down by the 11th Circuit twice now for how she's ruled in this case.

She's the most partisan out of all the judges and the court record supports this claim.

How bad does it hurt to be butt hurt?

a reply to: RazorV66

I'm just pointing out facts. You're the ones crying over Trump being held accountable for his actions.

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: RazorV66

I'm just pointing out facts. You're the ones crying over Trump being held accountable for his actions.

Trump didn't do anything. The accountants did and maybe lawyers "at the time". 😃

And remember Cohen is the one who made the payments to both broads BEFORE he even told Trump. 😬

originally posted by: RazorV66

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: matafuchs

Cannon has her job because of Trump. She's already been slapped down by the 11th Circuit twice now for how she's ruled in this case.

She's the most partisan out of all the judges and the court record supports this claim.

How bad does it hurt to be butt hurt?

Those "feelz" only keep coming from "you guys".

a reply to: xuenchen

Oh. Plausible deniability?

Or, implausible. That's the question.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: xuenchen

Oh. Plausible deniability?

Or, implausible. That's the question.

As my daughter says: "The boss never sits in the front seat".

a reply to: Annee

"There's no smoke without the worm turning".

a reply to: xuenchen

'Trump didn't do anything. The accountants did and maybe lawyers "at the time". 😃"

His accountants and his lawyers.