Source - King Charles has Pancreatic Cancer and Two Years to Live

Pancreatic Cancer Survival Odds in the United Kingdom.

10% survive for 1 year.

1% survive for 3 years.

Source: www.cancerresearchuk.org...

King Charles should live this life to its fullest, before he's too sick.

originally posted by: Boogerpicker
a reply to: FlyersFan

Why does anyone care about these useless inbreds?

And yet you are here reading and commenting? 🤔

a reply to: nerbot

No 'sweeping statement', just asking for clarity on your position.
Is that such a bad thing here on ATS now?

In the post I responded to you seemed to predict Charles getting some 'wonderdrug' treatment for his cancer which would be followed by 'the masses' acting like 'sheeple' and following suit.

Charles isn't the biggest fan of Big Pharma, there's a reasonable chance he'll seek some alternative and/or homeopathic treatments for his cancer.

If the general public subsequently followed suit would you then call them 'sheeple' for shunning Big Pharma and following Charlie's lead?

Engaging one's brain entails considering all evidence and all options before coming to a conclusion.
It does not mean assuming the default setting that everything is a conspiracy and then looking for evidence to prove this and dismissing evidence to the contrary.

a reply to: Freeborn

Nobody will KNOW what treatment Charles will ACTUALLY have except those close to him.

A cure for him for something not usually survivable in the form of a jab will make people want one out of fear for the big C which is mainstream news right now.

Personally, I couldn't give a damn about any of these treatments or cures or people and was merely speculating more than others seem to want to on this NOT conspiracy web site any more.

a reply to: nerbot
You want a conspiracy? here's one for you. Charles is a believer in natural treatments, now, what if he gets treated by natural medicine(as there's a few that claim success) and they work. Then the world would go off the big pharma/cancer treatments, radio/chemo etc, it this natural worked. They can't have that hitting their massive profits, but would Charles keep his mouth shut.

a reply to: nerbot

Of course this is still a conspiracy site, its what drew most of us here in the first place, especially the long term members.

But automatically assuming everything is a conspiracy shouldn't be the default setting and everything warrants a certain amount of scrutiny.
It was always accepted that if someone was claiming that there maybe a conspiracy angle to something that they were expected to provide supporting evidence and/or reasoning for their claim and others would challenge it or add additional evidence.
Recently the onus seems to have shifted onto those not blindly believing these conspiracy theories.

As far as I am aware there is no miracle jab that will cure cancer.
If there is I'm willing to consider any evidence provided to support the possibility and its effectiveness....or its possible side effects.
But I won't just blindly accept that there maybe one or that it may be administered to Charles. And I certainly won't accept that there may be side affects or that if there is its part of some sort of planned plot for worldwide depopulation without seeing and scrutinising evidence.

To suggest that I may be some sort of 'sheeple' - not that I'm saying you believe I am - is way wide of the mark.
I don't blindly believe what governments or TPTB tell us either.

I make my own mind up based on the evidence available to me.
If some people don't agree with me then fair enough, everyone is entitled to their own opinion.

a reply to: Freeborn
If there was a miracle jab a certain Mr Jobs would still be here.

AND bill gates had the patent for the gmo wonder plant. He will only charge what the market will bear.

Who would his target market be?

a reply to: crayzeed

originally posted by: nerbot
a reply to: Freeborn

Nobody will KNOW what treatment Charles will ACTUALLY have except those close to him.

A cure for him for something not usually survivable in the form of a jab will make people want one out of fear for the big C which is mainstream news right now.

Personally, I couldn't give a damn about any of these treatments or cures or people and was merely speculating more than others seem to want to on this NOT conspiracy web site any more.

If he has pancreatic cancer it doesn't matter what treatment he gets.

He' s toast.

Very soon.

a reply to: SchrodingersRat

We don't know if he has got it and the source for this is not very.... reliable.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: SchrodingersRat

We don't know if he has got it and the source for this is not very.... reliable.

Hence the first word of my post:

"If"

a reply to: SchrodingersRat

Fair enough.

Couldn't have happened to a nicer family... maybe it will lead to restitution between the roal family and the countless people they have stolen from over the centuries.

a reply to: Dandandat3

What a nasty thing to say.

a reply to: Dandandat3

Couldn't have happened to a nicer family...

Why would anyone wish cancer on someone?
Has Charles hurt you personally in any specific way?
If not, why such hatred and malice?

.....maybe it will lead to restitution between the roal family and the countless people they have stolen from over the centuries.

Restitution?
Who for?
Exactly what was stolen and when?

a reply to: Dandandat3

What has Kate and her children ever done to anyone?

I wouldn't wish cancer on my worst enemy.

Restitution, for what?

Ohh boo hoo - cry me a river.

But for the record I didn't wish cancer on these glorified celebrities; I just made it clear that if in fact they contract cancer that it wouldn't be all that consequently and would be a karmatic outcome.

The royal family; like many welthy estates derived their welth by looting the world over the centuries... so what did Kate and her children ever do to anyone? They live lavish life styles with blood money. Just because they are nee to the game doesn't absolve their involvement. No matter how much youed like to celebrate them.

Does that make them deserving of contracting cancer? I'm noy qualified to make that determination. But I'm not going to loose sleep over it either.