It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: SchrodingersRat
a reply to: Sookiechacha
They need fingerprints for a background check. Do you oppose a background before letting a person buy a gun?
Well, for starters, the people in the states of TX and VA oppose fingerprinting.
There are probably a lot of other states that oppose fingerprinting too.
Some NY'ers had a stroke when I brought my gun here legally from VA. NY had to allow it to comply with the Constitution's "full faith & credit" clause.
I really do love this country and our founding fathers. Brilliant men!
I’d rather just attest to who I am in a gun shop with only a signature.
Good idea.
originally posted by: grey580
a reply to: SchrodingersRat
I like the idea.
However, how is facial recognition any different from a finger print?
And how will you safeguard false positives?
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: SchrodingersRat
Just like getting proofed at a bar when you're younger.
Me and my fake ID got me into plenty of bars when I was younger. It was a real driver's license. It just wasn't mine.
I had to provide a valid ID to register to vote. Once registered, I don't need to show my ID again. I must attest that I am who I say I am by signature.