It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: opethPA
a reply to: xuenchen
Was the Blaze reporter arrested because " He's been reporting on some Jan6 stories" Or was he arrested on 4 misdemeanor charges of being where he shouldn't have been on the 6th?
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: budzprime69
a reply to: DBCowboy
Thread derailment I guess is not an enforced practice here?
Just pointing out marxists when I see them.
originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: Threadbarer
The more I think about the Herridge case the more I realize how tough a spot the judge is in.
A journalist should absolutely be allowed to keep their sources protected. At the same time, does Chen not have the right to have his grievances addressed in court? He can't make his case without knowing who provided Herridge her information.
So whose rights win out in the end? I guess that will be the question that the appeals court will need to answer.
originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: xuenchen
I disagree with Herridge being held in contempt. However, it should be noted, that the charge stems from a lawsuit filed by Yanping Chen in 2018 against the government for leaking information about an investigation into him and his business practices that ultimately resulted in no charges. It would ultimately hurt the government's case if Herridge is required to testify. So it makes no sense to say that she is being punished for her political beliefs.
As for Baker, he was not working as a journalist on J6. In fact, he wasn't employed as a journalist until last year. So that would mean he was an active participant in the riot. Why should he not be charged for his actions on that day just because of his current profession?
originally posted by: xuenchen
Now we see this gem:
(krassensteins)
The White House has just requested That Fox News and Sean Hannity retract their Hunter Biden Bribery Coverage
(scripps news)
White House pressures Fox News to correct Hunter Biden coverage
originally posted by: Vermilion
originally posted by: xuenchen
Now we see this gem:
(krassensteins)
The White House has just requested That Fox News and Sean Hannity retract their Hunter Biden Bribery Coverage
(scripps news)
White House pressures Fox News to correct Hunter Biden coverage
Crazy.
I don’t recall the Biden regime pressuring the press to retract real hoaxes that they pushed…
Russia Russia Russia
Pee dossier
Very fine people
Hunter Biden laptop
Desperation Mode Level = Maximum
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Klassified
They won't arrest the. . . "fact-Cheka's"