Professor Hacks Voting Machine During Testimony At Georgia Election Integrity Lawsuit

originally posted by: stelth2
a reply to: badcabbie

This is what Trump and others have been saying all along. Why has it taken so darn long for this to be shown in court?

What DTOM said, as far as I can tell.

originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed

originally posted by: stelth2
a reply to: badcabbie

This is what Trump and others have been saying all along. Why has it taken so darn long for this to be shown in court?

Corrupted and bribed judges and prosecutors, lawyers is why. They were likely bribed way in advance as well, with very large amounts.

Most likely. It's certainly possible that more nefarious means might have been employed though. Blackmail, threats against their persons or families, tactically outmaneuvered in some way that we don't understand, other...

originally posted by: Vermilion

Federal election infrastructure officials said in a joint statement on Thursday that the 2020 election was the "most secure in American history." November 12, 2020

They gave the game up immediately.
Just looking at the polls you can see each month that goes by more people know it was heavily manipulated.

Indeed. Hell, they practically announced their intentions beforehand, to anyone that was paying close attention. The media reporting leading up to the 2020 election, the sketchy rules changes in what would come to be known as "the swing states".

I can't help but wonder: why be so obvious about it? Sloppy? Supremely confident in their position? Orchestrated to evoke a reaction? Other?

originally posted by: WeMustCare
To elect a sleepy stuttering old man as President of the United States, when he won't even leave his basement to campaign, involved a lot of officials, from precinct captains, all the way up to Chief Justice John Roberts, who threw out every 2020 election case without looking at them.

The SC could have intervened prior to certification. At least, it certainly looks that way to this outsider looking at it through a dark glass. All of the indicators appeared to be there. Apparently they are compromised, complicit, or holding back for some other reason.

originally posted by: Irishhaf
Anyone in the tech industry knows they are hackable, they are set up by people of questionable training, in at least some cases they were connected to the internet.

Correct. In addition to Bev Harris's research, there have been videos circulating online for years(prior to 2020) of these machines being hacked at tech conventions in the same manner Halderman demonstrated during his testimony.

originally posted by: 5thHead
a reply to: Boomer1947

No. Read my two posts above yours.

They have known for years but the judge sealed the information.

I believe that's the Halderman Report you're referring to, written by professor Halderman, the same fella that hacked the machine during his court testimony.

@BadCabbie

Great thread and comments.

Cheers

a reply to: CriticalStinker

Trump has presented an opportunity fro us to break away from the typical turd sandwich versus giant douche paradigm we've been locked into for the last half century or so. If you want to think that it's still business as usual, go ahead. I disagree though, I think that sort of argument is unrealistic in the context of the candidates we're discussing. These are special circumstances, not business as usual.

a reply to: whereislogic

Interesting thoughts, but I can't say I agree wholeheartedly. On the one hand I agree. If you want to live a full life, then getting too caught up in earthly causes such as politics can sometimes get in the way of family, fulfilling relationships, and spiritual health.

On the other hand, if you dismiss all earthly concerns in the name of pursuing spiritual health and fulfillment, you remove yourself from the process of civic involvement and thereby lose the ability to make a difference with it.

Is it too much to ask for both? You know, pursue spiritual health by remaining detached enough to protect yourself and your family from undesired evil influence while also being civically involved enough to make a difference where possible.

a reply to: Boomer1947

Incorrect. These vulnerabilities have been known about for ten years or more, so anyone willing to look into the issue and learn about it could find that information, even Donald Trump. You could even learn about it yourself, and could have years ago, if you wanted to.

originally posted by: Dalamax
It would be marvellous timing because the wheels are wonky on that boxcar.

a reply to: badcabbie

Agree. Might derail if it tries to keep running like it is.

a reply to: network dude

Agree. Honest fair elections are important, if we want to actually have a country that's somewhat like the USA that we idealize as something even worth having.

Do we want to have a say in the way that the country is run, or do we want to simply be powerless subjects of the whims of faceless power brokers? If we want to have a say, then honest fair elections are important.

originally posted by: 0bserver1
a reply to: badcabbie
Paper ballots it's the only voting system we use here , its only corrupt if the people who have oversight and count the ballots are corrupt so both parties must be equally be present to do the job

Paper ballots seem like the way to go. Same day in person voting. Mail vote only by properly approved special absentee application. Identification required. Voter marked with indelible ink. Proper chain of custody. Partisan observers present for counting and protected by law.

It should be a transparent, verifiable process, not a murky black box.

I sometimes wonder how so many millions in this world could vote for what are clear scammers, con-artists, charletans, liars and deceivers (and their teams of other propagandists). Then I come to ATS and it all makes perfect sense again.

“For there will be a period of time when they will not put up with the wholesome* [Or “healthful; beneficial.”] teaching, but according to their own desires, they will surround themselves with teachers to have their ears tickled.* [Or “to tell them what they want to hear.”] They will turn away from listening to the truth and give attention to false stories.” (2 Timothy 4:3,4)

“So we should no longer be children, tossed about as by waves and carried here and there by every wind of teaching by means of the trickery of men, by means of cunning in deceptive schemes.” (Ephesians 4:14)

Probably already quoted these verses in this thread but it's worth repeating. Here's one I definitely didn't quote:

“But let God be found true, even if every man be found a liar.” (Romans 3:4)

Proven and demonstrated time and time again. I had to think about that one again after reading the news about the US attacks in Syria and Iraq and how the politicians in both the US and UK were selling these military actions to the voting public.

War—Why? (Awake!—1986)

...

Who Make the Decisions?

Austrian economist Schumpeter wrote: “The orientation toward war is mainly fostered by the domestic interests of ruling classes but also by the influence of all those who stand to gain individually from a war policy, whether economically or socially.” These ruling classes have been defined as “elites [that] are at all times involved in trying to manipulate other elements of the population, or the public mood itself, so as to perpetuate themselves in power.”​—Why War? by Professors Nelson and Olin.

Every nation has its ruling class, even though that group may be divided into different political factions. However, many observe that the power of the military elite in every nation should not be underestimated. Former U.S. Ambassador John K. Galbraith describes the military establishment as “by far the most powerful of the autonomous processes of government.” He continues: “The power of the military embraces not only the significant sources of power but . . . all the instruments of its enforcement. . . . More than any other exercise of power in our time it is the subject of grave public unease.”

Galbraith illustrates his point by reference to the United States military institution, which has property resources that “far exceed any similar source of power; they embrace not only what is available to the armed services and the civilian military establishment but what flows out to the weapons industries.” A like situation no doubt exists in the Soviet Union and many other countries. And therein lies a danger that could lead to a war of mutual annihilation​—that the power of the military establishment comes to exceed that of the political.

How Does Religion Influence War?

...

Nationalism​—The “Sacred Egoism” That Divides

Sometimes the people are not in favor of a war. On what basis, then, can the rulers most easily persuade the population to support their aims? This was the problem that faced the United States in Vietnam. So, what did the ruling elite do? Galbraith answers: “The Vietnam War produced in the United States one of the most comprehensive efforts in social conditioning [adjusting of public opinion] in modern times. Nothing was spared in the attempt to make the war seem necessary and acceptable to the American public.” And that points to the handiest tool for softening up a nation for war. What is it?

Professor Galbraith again supplies the answer: “Schools in all countries inculcate the principles of patriotism. . . . The conditioning that requires all to rally around the flag is of particular importance in winning subordination to military and foreign policy.” This systematic conditioning prevails in communist countries as it does in Western nations.

Charles Yost, a veteran of the U.S. Foreign Service and State Department, expressed it thus: “The primary cause of the insecurity of nations persists, the very attribute on which nations pride themselves most​—their sovereign independence, their ‘sacred egoism,’ their insubordination to any interest broader or higher than their own.” This “sacred egoism” is summed up in divisive nationalism, in the pernicious teaching that any one nation is superior to all others.

Historian Arnold Toynbee wrote: “The spirit of nationality is a sour ferment of the new wine of democracy in the old bottles of tribalism.” In Power and Immortality, Dr. Lopez-Reyes wrote: “Sovereignty is a major cause of contemporary war; . . . unless altered, the system of sovereign nation-states will trigger World War III.” [whereislogic: that last part a bit exaggerated perhaps. The perpetual war on terror being much more profitable. Guess you can call it WW III.] The emphasis on nationalism and sovereignty denies the basic concept that we all belong to the same human family, regardless of linguistic or cultural differences. And that denial leads to wars.

Yes, the experts can come up with all kinds of explanations of why man systematically sets out to destroy those of his own kind. Yet there is one primary factor that most commentators ignore.

The Hidden Cause of War

...

I left that last one empty on purpose, to invite people to read that hidden secret for themselves.

Going back a little in the article to 2 sections I skipped (cause I wanted to start with the Schumpeter quote first and emphasize it's accuracy/truthfulness), note that propagandists of evolutionary philosophies are the same type as a Donald Trump or Joseph Biden, 'in it' for themselves ("lovers of money" and "lovers of themselves" as 2Tim 3:2 puts it in the first 2 character attributes described there).

...

War​—In Our Genes?

Many theories are offered to explain the causes of war. For example, those who believe in evolution see man only as a higher form of animal life that still retains the aggressive and defensive reflexes of the animal world. They argue that aggression is innate in man, that it is in his genes. Zoologist Irenäus Eibl-Eibesfeldt wrote in The Biology of Peace and War: “Our closest relatives, the great apes, have considerable aggressive potential and are also territorial. . . . This strongly suggests that our human aggressivity may be an ancient primate heritage.”

Konrad Lorenz, Austrian founder of modern ethology (the study of animal behavior) asserts that man has an aggressive drive that is his “most powerfully motivating instinct [that] makes him go to war.”​—On Aggression.

On the other hand, Sue Mansfield, a professor of history, challenges that conclusion, saying: “Though the majority of cultures in historic times have engaged in war, the majority of human beings have not been participants.” The fact that governments have to resort to obligatory conscription into the armed forces would also suggest that aggression and killing are not necessarily viewed with great enthusiasm by people in general, nor can they be seen as reflex reactions. Professor Mansfield adds: “Indeed, the historical record suggests that warfare has usually been a minority experience.”

In recent times that minority has been highly trained and preconditioned. In addition, with the advent of artillery, bombs, and missiles, war and killing have also become more impersonal. In contrast with wars of past ages, the specialized minority can kill without actually seeing, let alone knowing, their victims. But if they do not know the enemy, how can people be motivated to fight?

The Role of Propaganda

Sometimes neighbors quarrel. But seldom does it lead to bloodshed. In the first place, the law of the land prohibits assault and murder against fellow citizens. But in time of war, that prohibition does not apply to citizens of an opposing country, even though people in general really do not know their “enemies.” All that they know about the enemy is what they have been led to believe by the spoon-feeding of their politically controlled media.

This is a fact of life in every nation. As Irenäus Eibl-Eibesfeldt wrote: “Public opinion is formed by interest groups (politicians, arms manufacturers, the military) that deceive the electorate by giving them false or one-sided information.” In a similar vein, historian H. E. Barnes wrote: “Since the wars of the French Revolution . . . copious and compelling propaganda [has] been continued and greatly increased to protect warfare against popular dissent, opposition, and factual analysis of issues.”

As a consequence, “practically anybody can be persuaded and manipulated in such a way that he will more or less voluntarily enter a situation wherein he must kill and perhaps die.” (War, by Gwynne Dyer) Thus, by reason of their political and economic power, the “elite” can control the media in order to prepare the masses for the bloodbath.

Adolf Hitler and Joseph Goebbels, leaders of the ruling Nazi elite, were well aware of the importance of mind control and deception of the masses. On August 24, 1939, Hitler explained to a group of high officers his plans for the invasion of Poland: “I shall give a propagandist cause for starting the war. Never mind whether it is plausible or not. . . . In starting and waging a war, it is not Right that matters but Victory.”

Thus it is clear that a motivation has to be generated to make a nation rise up against another. But what are the key elements in generating war fever?

...

The magazine isn't called Awake! for nothing people! Who is it that is brainwashed and gullible again? Where are the brainwashers found? Where are the people behaving as cultists or cult leaders? Read Isaiah 5:20,21 if I haven't quoted it here before, I'm out of space.

originally posted by: badcabbie

...
On the other hand, if you dismiss all earthly concerns in the name of pursuing spiritual health and fulfillment, you remove yourself from the process of civic involvement and thereby lose the ability to make a difference with it.

...

I'm familiar with that argument, it's 'responded' to in this documentary ('responded' as in pointing out how Jehovah's Witnesses have made a difference). Especially concerning the right to wake people up to all this (or at least attempt to, in spite of the 'wall' the ruler of this world and all his human and spirit pawns and victims have built around their minds, according to the description at 2Tim 4:3,4 and Isaiah 5:20,21, among many other such truths/facts/certainties/realities described in similar Bible texts).


“For though we walk in the flesh, we do not wage warfare* [“We do not wage warfare.” Lit., “we are not doing military service.” ...; Lat., non . . . mi·li·ta'mus.] according to what we are in the flesh. For the weapons of our warfare are not fleshly, but powerful by God for overturning strongly entrenched things. For we are overturning reasonings and every lofty thing raised up against the knowledge of God;” (2 Cor 10:3-5)

“A careful review of all the information available goes to show that, until the time of Marcus Aurelius [121-180 C.E.], no Christian became a soldier; and no soldier, after becoming a Christian, remained in military service.” (The Rise of Christianity, by E. W. Barnes, 1947, p. 333) “It will be seen presently that the evidence for the existence of a single Christian soldier between 60 and about 165 A.D. is exceedingly slight; . . . up to the reign of Marcus Aurelius at least, no Christian would become a soldier after his baptism.” (The Early Church and the World, by C. J. Cadoux, 1955, pp. 275, 276) “In the second century, Christianity . . . had affirmed the incompatibility of military service with Christianity.” (A Short History of Rome, by G. Ferrero and C. Barbagallo, 1919, p. 382) “The behavior of the Christians was very different from that of the Romans. . . . Since Christ had preached peace, they refused to become soldiers.” (Our World Through the Ages, by N. Platt and M. J. Drummond, 1961, p. 125) “The first Christians thought it was wrong to fight, and would not serve in the army even when the Empire needed soldiers.” (The New World’s Foundations in the Old, by R. and W. M. West, 1929, p. 131) “The Christians . . . shrank from public office and military service.” (Editorial introduction to “Persecution of the Christians in Gaul, A.D. 177,” in The Great Events by Famous Historians, edited by R. Johnson, 1905, Vol. III, p. 246) “While they [the Christians] inculcated the maxims of passive obedience, they refused to take any active part in the civil administration or the military defence of the empire. . . . It was impossible that the Christians, without renouncing a more sacred duty, could assume the character of soldiers, of magistrates, or of princes.”—The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, by Edward Gibbon, Vol. I, p. 416.






Context (or next one in the playlist):
the bible-accurate history reliable prophecy part 1 of 3

First video in the playlist (1st topic is Creation vs evolution, or philosophical naturalism and the false religion known as "scientism", takes up about 46 videos at the moment, most are short though):

Real science, knowledge of realities compared to unverified philosophies and stories

originally posted by: Boogerpicker
a reply to: Boomer1947

Do you work with computers at your job? If so, does everyone have the same password? Are you able to install any software you loke because you and your IT department have the same password? Of course not! That would be silly!!!! But totally normal for Arizona election officials. There is evidence of that.... which is like saying the suspect has the same gun, and the bullet matches, but you're hung up on whether or not he explicitly identified himself to anyone at the crime scene lol. I swear, when it comes to Trump people can pull dog whistles oit of thin air. When it comes to anything they don't want to believe is true they're clueless NPC's.
The Biden campaign collided with big tech, legacy media, and intelligence officials to influence the election with Hunter's laptop. You still up in the air on that too? That alone should have people lined up for a firing squad. Broken chains of custody literally everywhere you look, illegal ballot boxes, illeagally bypassing state legislatures to enact laws that are literally the reason why fems say Biden won. I don't call them illegal because. I don't like them, but because they've actually been found to be illegal since the election occurred. I'm sorry Trump hurt your feelings. I'm sure you chose the right corrupt old white sex offender racist to vote for because those things truly matter to you lol.

Yup. Sure looks rigged to anyone who bothered to look into it in any detail. After looking into it in any detail, it's frankly hard to believe that it might have been an honest election.

originally posted by: Arthurox1717
ARE
YOU
F******
Kidding
Me... right now?! 🤣 😡🙄
I knew the machines could and eventually be hacked...... BUT SAFE MODE???! Hidden LITERALLY in plain sight to be accessible to anyone with 3 months on a Windows OS!

And NO ONE, thought to have them examined for this??

Tell me now how this wasn't planned all along!!
Someone's ****** needs to answer to this. (Russian collusion.... NOT HARDLY!! )

This is the proof!! BAM!

PsyOP 101!

I won't do that, because as far as I can tell it was planned for all along. Those vulnerabilities were built into these machines, presumably to facilitate fraud.

I think one of the big overall problems with voting machines in general is that they're all essentially a black box. Even with the most secure of machines anybody other than a computer engineer who is also a software engineer has to take somebody else's word for it.

Physical, paper ballots, are a collection of documents that comprise the public's decision in the election. Though perhaps a large collection of documents, they are physical objects that are what they are. Understandable by most people educated enough to vote.

a reply to: whereislogic

That's such a defeatist attitude. Even in the Old Testament, Judges were appointed for the 12 tribes to help with disputes and guide decisions.

Of course, each generation brings with it it's own effects by enforcing or ignoring of rules and laws. I do believe in the beginning of the USA, that sound logic and common sense were at least attempted to be established via the constitution and bill of rights for society in general.

We no longer live in a society where everyone can do whatever they want because they're too many people and so many want their decisions to affect other's lifestyles. So leaders are elected to establish commonality of social standards and rule of law. The fact that sensibility is being chipped away and affected by the most persuasive and squeakiest wheels simply shows that we have become a nation of simps no longer for the welfare or common interest of the majority of the people.

With the massive number of persons back in those biblical times and as well today, it's illogical to NOT have representatives and leaders.

Putting your faith in, well that's another story. One can hope and expect but should never assume. And 2 Timothy 4:3, 4 certainly seems to portray the current situation doesn't it!? Or maybe I should say, when doesn't it? But one should do the best they can, follow their conscious and do the right thing.

On topic, there is nothing un-hackable. I believe everyone knows this but choosing to deny that it has happened is simply a circumstance of convenience. Or everything is falling into place as planned depending on one's position.

Which leads to me this, Trump is a danger to the left's ideology. If he is chosen as POTUS, his policies will be short lived just as they were before if that's what the people decide. So, what's the worry? The left will have their WEF, NWO, OWG soon enough.

Anyone knows a way to contact Mr. SCOTT CREIGHTON. I have an interesting theory about Howard Vyse and the great pyramid

Some more reporting on this case. I presume we will see a ruling on it soon, though I have low hopes that anything will change about Georgia's system this year.
www.theguardian.com...
www.nbcnews.com...