More and more states supporting Texas.

It’s all over Twitter right now.

More and more states are coming out in support of Texas…

And the ruling by Supremem court was only on one aspect - the razor wire. It has not made it’s final final ruling yet on the situation.

It better get it’s Butt in gear or we might end in civil war.






Montana
Iowa
Arkansas
Idaho
Louisiana
Florida
Utah
Georgia
Montana
South Dakota
Virginia
Oklahoma
Tennessee
West Virginia
Wyoming
North Dakota
Nebraska
Alabama
Alaska
Indiana
Mississippi
Missouri
Nevada
New Hampshire
Ohio
South Carolina

I don't think any state will secede from the union...

They like the govt. subsidies to much.



taxfoundation.org...

Things are escalating rapidly

originally posted by: lilzazz
I don't think any state will secede from the union...

They like the govt. subsidies to much.



taxfoundation.org...

if that's your take away from all this, you make me smile.

The more states that support this, the more pressure Joey has to stop using all his time and resources KEEPING the border open. He might even be able to change his plan and protect our nation, that's doubtful, as the current situation is exactly what they/he wanted, but with enough pressure, who knows.

a reply to: pianopraze

The game is already lost.

Now just wait for the next great American tragedy and The Patriot Act 2.0.


All while the people funding it are bled dry.

originally posted by: lilzazz
I don't think any state will secede from the union...

They like the govt. subsidies to much.



taxfoundation.org...

Yeah not sure about a civil war as the OP states, and any states actually trying to secede.


It's not realistic at all. No Fema assistance,especially Florida, no farms subsidies for those plains states, no social security and medicare, no longer any military bases, so no income to those businesses surrounding them. That's just the tip of funding that individuals receive. Not including federal grants for emergency services, bridges, for city and state services.

youtu.be...

a reply to: frogs453

I missed that in the OP, do you have a link for which states are talking about seceding?

a reply to: network dude

I stated the civil war reference in the op and the other members post about any states trying to secede.

Although arguably can't imagine states engaged in a civil war against other states or the government wanting to stay under federal jurisdictions.

Maybe the OP can clarify what a civil war will entail.

originally posted by: frogs453

originally posted by: lilzazz
I don't think any state will secede from the union...

They like the govt. subsidies to much.



taxfoundation.org...

Yeah not sure about a civil war as the OP states, and any states actually trying to secede.


It's not realistic at all. No Fema assistance,especially Florida, no farms subsidies for those plains states, no social security and medicare, no longer any military bases, so no income to those businesses surrounding them. That's just the tip of funding that individuals receive. Not including federal grants for emergency services, bridges, for city and state services.

So states in your view are bound to dismiss illegality and dire harm because they are reliant on federal subsidies?

I wonder where else we can apply this logic......

I called Tate Reeves , the governor of MS. His office just wanted to talk about some economic plan he had spent the last couple of weeks. They had no comment on the southern invasion.

They are preparing us....

a reply to: JinMI

The OP made mention of civil war. In which I addressed how that would work, and maybe they could clarify.

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: JinMI

The OP made mention of civil war. In which I addressed how that would work, and maybe they could clarify.

And you made mention of the governmental control scheme of Democrats going far back into history.

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: JinMI

The OP made mention of civil war. In which I addressed how that would work, and maybe they could clarify.

You don't even understand how the Constitution works.

The idea you could form a coherent thought on a potential civil war is laughable.

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: network dude

I stated the civil war reference in the op and the other members post about any states trying to secede.

Although arguably can't imagine states engaged in a civil war against other states or the government wanting to stay under federal jurisdictions.

Maybe the OP can clarify what a civil war will entail.

so that was just made up, OK.

a reply to: pianopraze


I totally expect a civil war coming out of the states in your OP. All my prepper stuff for the Chinese invasion will come in handy.

Bring it tough guy...if you think it will solve anything.

a reply to: frogs453

Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.…

Outbreak of the Civil War (1861)

Even as Lincoln took office in March 1861, Confederate forces threatened the federal-held Fort Sumter in Charleston, South Carolina. On April 12, after Lincoln ordered a fleet to resupply Sumter, Confederate artillery fired the first shots of the Civil War.

Interesting to see Virginia on that list. Will have a chance in someways, maybe in others.

sadly, even if they can force a wall on Biden, we've already had 3+ years of unknown individuals cross the border.

good for the Democrats, bad for the USA