The reason Hunter Biden's actions matter

Spam

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: network dude

So he has evidence, but of something that should be illegal but not actually a crime. Other committee member Grassley stated already linked:

He continued, saying the facts “haven’t taken me to that point where I can say that the president’s guilty of anything.”

So, ok, they have evidence, but no crime. Got it, since you want to continue to try to pick it apart. They can just keep digging then. I'm sure they will have "the facts" that show he is guilty soon. Probably when Sydney releases the Kracken, Lindell and Trump release the proof of election fraud, and Trumps health plan is no longer an empty binder provided to 60 minutes.

see, this is progress. You have learned that spreading lies here won't fly. There is evidence, just not enough to convict. So we can stop having this particular discussion. Thanks.

a reply to: Boomer1947

The current EV push benefits China over any other nation. That's a Joe Biden thing. So that answers this:

Also, can anyone point to any US policies toward China since he became POTUS that Joe has taken that would in any way suggest that he is in the tank for China?

Show me a similar fact pattern with Joe Biden and you might be onto something.

you are making this too easy.

explain how this isn't a quid pro quo.

Again, it wasn't that he left Afghanistan, is was the way he left. He left billions in equipment, and American people. It was on TV, you should look into that.

the Senate Select Committee that investigated this found that Paul Manafort had in fact, colluded with Konstantin Kilimnik, a Russian intelligence agent, by giving him Trump Team sensitive campaign polling data and the campaign's strategy for beating Hillary Clinton. Not a criminal conspiracy, but Trump team and Putin team were clearly working for the same result.

And wasn't Paul Manafort charged with a FARA violation? The same thing is seems Hunter is guilty of? Great comparison, you did well on that. If you keep this up, you might learn some things.

a reply to: network dude

Seriously? What is the lie? I guess I should have also noted that there was sarcasm there since you missed it.

I expanded the quote that I've already posted, but again I'll link to video of committee member Grassley:

“I’m going to take the same position that I’ve taken since 2019 that all I can say is there’s some indication, maybe some compromise with China particularly, but I have no evidence of it,”
He continued, saying the facts “haven’t taken me to that point where I can say that the president’s guilty of anything.”

Link


"I have no evidence"

"the facts haven't taken me to a point where I can say the President is guilty of anything"

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: network dude

Seriously? What is the lie? I guess I should have also noted that there was sarcasm there since you missed it.

I expanded the quote that I've already posted, but again I'll link to video of committee member Grassley:

“I’m going to take the same position that I’ve taken since 2019 that all I can say is there’s some indication, maybe some compromise with China particularly, but I have no evidence of it,”
He continued, saying the facts “haven’t taken me to that point where I can say that the president’s guilty of anything.”

Link


"I have no evidence"

"the facts haven't taken me to a point where I can say the President is guilty of anything"

quote what you said, then quote what you found Comer said. Stick with what you said, and what comer said. If you can't see it, I'll be way more than happy to post it.

eta:
You even admitted to it, and now you are denying it. This is unreal.

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: network dude

Sure we should care. It is important. However, it's been 3 years, and Comer keeps getting caught saying and even posting as I pointed out, there is no evidence. Lots of maybe, could be, possibly, think,believe, etc. There is nothing noted that Hunter has done anything improper while his father is President as well.

notice the bold part. That's the lie.

then you post:

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: network dude

So he has evidence, but of something that should be illegal but not actually a crime. Other committee member Grassley stated already linked:

again, notice the bold part. That's you acknowledging you have been spreading lies. And try to remember, Comer is note Grassley, they are two different entities. Bother Republicans, but not the same person.

I cannot explain this in any other way, but if you fail to accept your own words as proof, you have a sickness that I cannot help with.

originally posted by: SpyingOnSpies
Has anyone ever watched soap operas?
I'll admit to indulging in those "stories" with my mamaw when I was a little boy. Everyday she'd have to "watch her stories."

One thing I noticed was, how long they would drag stuff out.
One conversation between two people, standing in the same room, can last for months sometimes. They draw these stories out, and keep giving a little more, and a little more to the "story" every day. Dragging things out endlessly to a final reveal type of moment in the story. And when the final reveal moment comes.....it only leads to more dragging out of the narrative theme.
An endless black hole of nothingness.
Word salads with dramatic effect.

Thats what all this crap reminds me of.

It's all a soap opera, playing out slowly, inch by inch, detail by detail. And it will go nowhere.

They just want you to follow along with their daily stories.

Peace

Why do you think they’re in so deep with media? It all needs scriptwriters/actors/extras etc

a reply to: network dude

Sigh. He has thousands of docs and testimony, call it evidence if you will. Evidence of what? As he said, things that SHOULD be illegal. Direct evidence of a crime? Not according to them both.

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: network dude

Sigh. He has thousands of docs and testimony, call it evidence if you will. Evidence of what? As he said, things that SHOULD be illegal. Direct evidence of a crime? Not according to them both.

Sigh, those with integrity can admit to making mistakes. Those without, cannot.

your ticket has been punched.

a reply to: network dude

I apologize for wording it incorrectly.

Interesting that you are stuck on the verbiage, and keep harping on that, however it seems to be a distraction as you have never addressed that both Comer and Grassley have said have no direct evidence of a crime.

Ooohhh my ticket has been punched? This s**t is funny as heck.

Those with integrity would say that "although the wording is not exact, I do see what you mean as both GOP members have stated they do not have facts or evidence of a crime."

a reply to: frogs453

So far there's no proven proof that Trump's documents were actually still classified.

The Biden illegally stored classified materials at his home(s) and office(s) are proven to be classified and still are classified.

Let's not jump the gun. 😀

a reply to: frogs453

Those with integrity would say that "although the wording is not exact, I do see what you mean as both GOP members have stated they do not have facts or evidence of a crime."

False .

They have Facts and Evidence .

What they don't have is enough to prosecute a Sitting POTUS . Once he is out of Office though he is toast him and his wayward Son Hunter. Politicians are very vengeful , though I doubt Joe will live long enough to experience any punishment or see any of his Sons face Justice.

That is Joe's only protection and Hunters ..... The office of the President . Take Nixon for example , He could have fought his impeachment and criminal inquiry to the point that he was able to finish his term as President .

But he didn't , He resigned .

A sitting President cannot be Criminally prosecuted you know this ....

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: network dude

I apologize for wording it incorrectly.

Interesting that you are stuck on the verbiage, and keep harping on that, however it seems to be a distraction as you have never addressed that both Comer and Grassley have said have no direct evidence of a crime.

Ooohhh my ticket has been punched? This s**t is funny as heck.

Those with integrity would say that "although the wording is not exact, I do see what you mean as both GOP members have stated they do not have facts or evidence of a crime."

don't worry, it's not some ominous threat. Just acknowledgement that you aren't capable of admitting to being wrong, and my admiration was misplaced. Won't happen again.