No evidence for systematic voter fraud: A guide to statistical claims about the 2020 election

originally posted by: matafuchs
Here you go. Swing States or Battleground states.

That is simply evidence that more people voted for President Biden, than loser trump.

originally posted by: matafuchs
Here you go. Swing States or Battleground states.

Link

Arizona, Georgia, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin combined were about 110k votes. It handed the election to BIden.

Arizona - Lost by @ 10k votes but had 140k more votes than 2016 - Won 2016 by 3.5%
Florida - Gained votes and won both times and 100k more votes than 2016, Obama won here in 2012
Georgia - Lost by @ 8k votes but had 400k more votes than 2016 - Won 2016 by 5%
Iowa - Gained votes and won both times and 100k more votes than 2016
Michigan - Lost by @ 150k votes but had 400k more votes than 2016 - Won 2016 by .5%
Nevada - Lost by @120k votes but had 140k more votes than in 2016 -Lost Both
North Carolina - Gained votes and won both times and 400k more votes than 2016
Ohio - Gained votes and won both times and 300k more votes than 2016
Pennsylvania - Lost by @ 80k votes but had 350k more votes than 2016 - Won 2016 by .7%
Wisconsin - Lost by @ 20k votes but had 200k more votes than 2016 - Won 2016 by .5%

He also took and held Iowa. Obama had that in 2012.

In no states did he go backward. Statistically to me this is not possible. We are supposed to believe the same states he gained votes in, and was willing before midnight, ALL flipped?

The numbers do not show someone who is hated. Just the opposite. It would be very easy to accept if he truly did tank in 2020, have 57 million in the popular...but that did not happen.

Have any of you ever looked up who the actual electors are? In ANY newscast ever have you heard that HIllary Clinton is an elector as well as her husband Bill? How about Letitia James? All Electors in NY so do not ever think it is all not rigged. A US Elector who ran on a platform to jail someone is trying to do that to a former president running for office. Amazing.

It is not coincidence all the states he won in 2016, that gave him the won, flipped but he gained voters. The guy who is so hated.

Just read it is almost time to put the masks back on...happened the same time in 2019.

Any evidence Trump lost by illegitimate means? And 10K or 8K votes are not a few hundreds where you can contest the result.

Trump getting more votes than what he got in the 2016 election doesn't prove any of the claims made. Is not even an argument!

originally posted by: navigator70
but the fact is The Times article came right out and told you how they did it,

Oh, you mean the article that was digitally altered?
www.reuters.com...

"Social media users are sharing a screenshot of a New York Times article with a headline about the 2020 U.S. presidential election being stolen. The headline, however, has been digitally altered from an existing article.

Examples can be seen here and here .

The headline in the screenshot reads: “Even if the election was stolen, recalling it will just further divide the country.”

No article on the New York Times website has this headline, visible here ."

You really should not believe social media!

originally posted by: bruce88

originally posted by: matafuchs
Here you go. Swing States or Battleground states.

That is simply evidence that more people voted for President Biden, than loser trump.

It is.

It's so simple but the Trump supporters don't want to accept it.

a reply to: Jane1B

What is it if it is so simple?

a reply to: Jane1B

No argument. Because you say so? Where is your evidence it was not stolen?

a reply to: bruce88

What is it?

originally posted by: matafuchs
a reply to: Jane1B

No argument. Because you say so? Where is your evidence it was not stolen?

Oh dear, please explain how you prove a negative! In the real world, those making the claim have to back that claim up - which trumpists are unable to. It is not up to others to disprove every silly claim.

a reply to: bruce88

You didn't read it. You simply looked,said it is Trumpy and came up with something you thought was witty so Jane1B would give you a star.

It is also not about proving a negative. I think it was not a secure election. You do. How do you think it was secure?

originally posted by: bruce88

Oh, you mean the article that was digitally altered?
www.reuters.com...

Swing and a miss. But youre right where the puppet masters want you.

Election Fraud Cases

originally posted by: matafuchs
a reply to: Jane1B

No argument. Because you say so? Where is your evidence it was not stolen?

Do you know the term 'burden of proof' ??
I asked earlier but no answer was given.

originally posted by: bruce88

originally posted by: matafuchs
a reply to: Jane1B

No argument. Because you say so? Where is your evidence it was not stolen?

Oh dear, please explain how you prove a negative! In the real world, those making the claim have to back that claim up - which trumpists are unable to. It is not up to others to disprove every silly claim.

I was sure it will happen.

Now they're asking us to disprove their election fraud claims. Is getting very funny!

a reply to: Jane1B

So as a Trumpaphobe, what about him makes you not be able to focus on anything else?

a reply to: Jane1B

Nothing but questions to questions. No one is asking you to do anything but I would like to know why you think it was a secure election?

🐒😀 At least 5,600 federal-only ballots cast in Arizona 2020 election without US citizenship proof

originally posted by: WingDingLuey
🐒😀 At least 5,600 federal-only ballots cast in Arizona 2020 election without US citizenship proof

Thats why the border is wide open. Importing a new electorate.