Recently, almost the entire Black Sea coast faced a storm of unprecedented strength and destructiveness. An orange level of danger was declared in
most provinces of Turkey, the Crimean Peninsula was practically washed away into the sea, an aquarium museum founded in the 19th century was flooded
and destroyed in Russia, and videos of ruined coastal infrastructure are circulating online.
apnews.com...
The natural disaster that struck the Black Sea was unique not only because of the unprecedented wave height, which exceeded 9 meters (even though
waves larger than 8m were not ever recorded), but also because it was completely unexpected and sudden. To provoke such a strong storm in the fairly
closed Black Sea, ordinary wind would not be enough. What was needed is either a shift of tectonic plates (but nothing like this has been recorded),
an eruption of an underwater volcano (which does not exist in the Black Sea), or external influence. The latter seems pretty likely. One of the most
powerful complexes for "studying instabilities" in the ionosphere EISCAT (European Incoherent Scatter radar site) is located in Norway, near Tromso,
which is not far from the region. EISCAT is an analogue of the infamous HAARP in Alaska. By the way, an interesting fact: in Kamchatka, not far from
this very HAARP, the sea also overflowed its banks, flooding the local airport.
It is known for sure that it is possible to tweak the ionosphere using radio waves. And EISCAT and HAARP can precisely target the ionosphere over the
desired area. If you choose the right time and weather conditions, you can provoke a serious anticyclone over a specific region.
In general, given events in the world, the option of human intervention in climate laws does not look so unlikely. Russia is now busy with the war in
Ukraine, the world's attention is focused on the situation in Palestine, and winter is approaching in the Black Sea region, when a storm is not
something surprising. Why isn't it a good time to test climate weapons?
The problem is that Russia may also have such a weapon. Back in Soviet times, the Russians developed a similar complex. It is not known whether it is
functioning now, but in one thing we can be one hundred percent sure - if climate weapons are used by one side, the other will not remain in
debt.
edit on 30-11-2023 by Mickey763 because: (no reason given)