Russia produces carbon dioxide massively

Hello ATS!

I’ll now say one thing that will give supporters of “green energy” a heart attack. Contrary to the globalist theory of “green energy”, in Russia the theory about the positive impact of carbon dioxide on the ecology of our planet is gaining weight on the scientific platform. The fact is that it has been scientifically proven that the more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, the more and better the plants and trees that consume it develop.

It all started with a “paradox” - scientists noticed that deforestation in Russia is increasing, but, oddly enough, the forest area is also increasing. That is, the more forests are cut down, the more they grow. Forest is an inexhaustible resource. But at the same time, the “worse”, according to Western (mainly British) scientists, the ecological state of the planet (warming, and so on), the better and larger the state of the “green lungs” of the planet. Hence the massive and market appearance of carbon dioxide generators, which are used in agricultural technologies in Russia. Moreover, similar ideas were put forward in Russia more than 100 years ago by the great founder of the theory of aeronautics and interplanetary travel, Konstantin Tsiolkovsky. True, many are now trying to develop his theories further:

“About Tsiolkovsky’s proposal to burn forests to increase plant yields by increasing the percentage of carbon dioxide in the air. I talked to a specialist here. I suppose today Tsiolkovsky would not put forward such a proposal. Over the past 94 years, technology has stepped far forward. Plant productivity really increases from an increase in the content There is CO₂ in the air, but besides burning forests there is another way - they have invented and sell inexpensively a carbon dioxide generator for greenhouses, it costs several tens of thousands of rubles, it is easy to find by searching for “CO₂ generator”, for example.

A friend said that they buy generators of this type quite en masse.

And if the plants are in an open field, then you can add something to the soil, which gradually decomposes and releases CO₂. This provides more carbon dioxide that plants need than if you put even a powerful installation nearby, since quite quickly the excess carbon dioxide in the open air will mix and fly away."

I would like to remind dear members of the ATS that after the introduction of more than 20 thousand sanctions, Russia has become a world leader in agriculture and the production of organic food.

Moreover, it is already a fact that the Green Agenda has failed on a global scale. The prospects for Russian oil are the brightest, in the good sense of this long-suffering word.

"The UN stated the failure of the "green agenda"

Global hydrocarbon fuel production in 2030 is expected to be more than double the level that would be compatible with meeting the goals of the 2015 Paris Agreement, a UN report says.

Under it, participants pledged to strive to keep global temperature rise below 2°C above pre-industrial levels - and even try to limit the increase to 1.5°C.

The report analyzed data for the 20 largest hydrocarbon fuel producing countries and concluded that they will produce 110% more fuel in 2030 than would be compatible with the 1.5°C target, and 69% more than would be compatible with a reference point of 2°C.

None of these 20 countries have made sufficient commitments to reduce coal, oil and gas production to achieve the 1.5°C target.

The 20 countries covered in the report account for 82% of hydrocarbon fuel production and 73% of its consumption. The list includes, but is not limited to, Australia, China, Norway, Qatar, UK, UAE and US."

Link

At the same time, the “greening of Germany” is postponed once again. All the country’s money was spent on Russophobia and friendship with the United States. If earlier there was an opinion that if you want to ruin a country, then give it an aircraft carrier, but now - make friends with the United States. Because friendship with the United States is now enormously expensive, and costs countries from complete ruin and poverty to the loss of their sovereignty.

Continued below...

“German Finance Minister Christian Lindner, a member of the ruling FDP party, believes that the republic should forget about dreams of abandoning coal energy by 2030 until the country has enough other inexpensive energy sources.

According to him, in the coalition agreement, members of the FDP, the Social Democratic Party and the Greens have already agreed that the exit from coal energy should ideally be postponed to 2030.

However, while the German authorities are not confident that the country has a sufficient amount of “inexpensive energy resources, we should not dream of abandoning coal energy in 2030,” when there is not enough energy in the republic, it becomes expensive.

Germany is currently gradually trying to switch to renewable energy sources by shutting down coal power plants and nuclear power plants. It is planned to fully achieve climate neutrality by 2045. Initially, during the transition period, the emphasis was on Russian energy resources, primarily on Russian gas."

Link

I feel sorry for the Germans, I have a lot of friends in Germany with whom we met in the Caucasus mountains.

As a result, another fantastic project of the world globalist elite fails. You can't fool nature.

Thank you!

When I was a child the BBC in its pre David Attenborough incarnation had a go to guy for all things nature. His name was David Bellamy (look him up anywhere for his qualifications and compare with those of the Swedish snot goblin). Then one day around twenty years ago Mr Bellamy said something that the man made climate challeng mafia could not countenance and was dropped by BBC and every other mainstream outlet like a red hot ember. a reply to: RussianTroll

a reply to: RussianTroll

scientists noticed that deforestation in Russia is increasing, but, oddly enough, the forest area is also increasing. That is, the more forests are cut down, the more they grow.

I'm sorry , but what ? , the more you deforest the more Forrest you get ?

Are these scientists theoretical physicist by any chance.

a reply to: gortex
According to official Russian statistics, the forest area has only increased in recent years, despite all the enormous deforestation. I understand that this does not fit into the minds of supporters of Greta and the “green agenda”. Maybe we should return to nature and its laws, and not blindly believe in the utopian theories of globalists?

a reply to: RussianTroll

I understand that this does not fit into the minds of supporters of Greta and the “green agenda”.

As someone who doesn't support the “green agenda” I can't imagine what's in their minds other than probably some for of Utopia living with the bunny rabbits .

Maybe we should return to nature and its laws, and not blindly believe in the utopian theories of globalists?

I agree.

a reply to: gortex

I am very glad that our views and judgments at least sometimes coincide, my friend))))

a reply to: gortex
Is it something to do with Deforest Kelly cos he's dead. The plant/ carbon dioxide connection has been known about for years. It's one of the unacknowledged reasons that the Dutch government are going after their farmers as they have learn this lesson and have massive covered field which they actively pump in CO2 and get healthier and more productive crops.

Top Carbon Dioxide (CO2) producers list . China is making that huge amounts ..


The 5 Countries That Produce the Most Carbon Dioxide (CO2)

I am not against CO2, we could have it much more .....more than Greta could ever imagine.

CO2 is vital for plant life, without them we are all dead. I have not seen any real evidence of the sea levels rising in this part of the world from all the Al Gore fear porn years ago.

Cars do release more than just CO2, some of these compounds do cause problems. Not as bad as SO2, which now has scrubbers to reduce acid rain. With the haze over Los Angeles from its automobile infrastructure, I can understand the pressure to improve the combustion process.

When living in a valley of a large city, asthma rates are higher as it acts like a sump for all the airborne pollution. Those that live higher in the hills have less lung issues.

It does look like atmospheric CO2 levels are only a small percentage of what it was in prehistoric times, the Earth can handle a lot more and in some ways needs it to keep the plant life thriving.

But what about "acid rain"?😳

I was learnt in primary school that plants use carbon dioxide to grow and release oxygen as a byproduct of that process, making carbon dioxide a mutually beneficial gas. We exhale it, the plant uses it, and in reciprocation, the plants give off oxygen. It's a beautiful thing.

So what's the problem with CO2 if the photosynthesis exchange ratio is 1:1??

It was drilled into every young mind in my class that the world would die if we wiped out the rainforests! Yet, they continue to rape the living 💩 out it to this day, and with more and more disappearing, the idea is to decrease carbon dioxide?🤔 Seems legit.🙄

In other news, Genghis Khan killed so many people during his reign that it lowered the carbon dioxide of the entire planet! Genghis couldn't have known that then, but modern-day Eco-Nazis might have gleaned a few pointers from that and well, the culling has since commenced?

Eh, don't mind me, I'm just paranoid, sorry.🤷🏻

Ps - Is the hole in the ozone above the northern hemisphere still a thing, or did we move on? I missed the announcement I guess. Oh well...

That Israel and Palestine thing, right??

Ah, the delusion is strong with this thread.
Please wake me up when Russia is leading in anything other than lying on an industrial scale on how 'advanced' it is (it's not) and how 'cultured' (it's also not).
Before anyone asks I was at a conference in Singapore at the start of this month. The Singaporean Government is extremely worried about sea level rise. Which is happening. Educate yourselves.

a reply to: AngryCymraeg2

But we did! Here's a simplified explanation from one of the leading scientists!
m.youtube.com...

originally posted by: VariedcodeSole
a reply to: AngryCymraeg2

But we did! Here's a simplified explanation from one of the leading scientists!
m.youtube.com...

Really? Where's the /s disclaimer on your post?

a reply to: VariedcodeSole

Ps - Is the hole in the ozone above the northern hemisphere still a thing, or did we move on? I missed the announcement I guess. Oh well...

Yeah, its still a thing. As for how bad with all the chemtrails going on? As weather modification has become a national security issue, above my pay grade too.

a reply to: RussianTroll

Interesting as when farmer here in the USA grow plants in a greenhouse the they pump CO2 into the greenhouse to promote growth and heath of the plants.

CO2 Enrichment in Greenhouses

a reply to: Waterglass


That's why eating bugs is a better option.

a reply to: VariedcodeSole

Bug protein will have less outgassing than uncle freds explosive Diarrhea. I hate the thought of having to eat bugs as some 80 something WEF lost cause Nazi dictator said so.