Musk in doodoo again for anti-Semitism

a reply to: FurPerson

I speak my mind based on my observations.

I'm not willing to walk into the trap to group all Jewish people together, but I will also not deny what is to my observation indeed a nefarious conspiracy perpetrated by people who falsely identify as Jewish as one of the most if not the most effective camouflage ever created by any group of people.

They truly are a several steps above the rest, unequaled in the way they play/run the game we experience as daily life.

And I don't hide my opinion because of peer pressure or fear of being ostracized in any way, shape or form.

If you can acknowledge that, then at least remember I'm calling for an end to hostilities against ALL PEOPLES.

That includes those I criticize.

When I go out, I don't see all these Jews some people are claming are here to take over? I see lots more people from other religions far more? Yet this myth of a jewish take over still hangs on since the National Socialist German Workers Party claimed it was happening in Germany a long time ago?

Musk really needs to stop talking and pretending he's clever. I mean he's been going on about freedom of speech and people's rights since before taking over twitter, but is happy to kiss ass of China's Xi, who's quick to quash anyone he can if they say anything against the communist party of China and stop any freedom of speech there?
Musk will say anything that gets him attention and makes him feel big and thats all.

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: underpass61

I don't remember anyone crying cancel culture over Bud Light. I remember people pointing out the hypocrisy that the Right cries everytime someone gets canceled for saying some bigoted # and then doing the same thing over something very benign.

Of course you see it that way

The difference between the two is that these corporations have a legal obligation to their shareholders. If association with Twitter threatens their stock value then it is their responsibility to cut ties.

Who said this?

Here, we have multimillion dollar advertising contracts being pulled (which is fine)

And who said this?

I wonder if they'll also deplatform the app

derp

Musk is more saying that he's going to sue Media Matters for posting the article that led to all of these advertisers leaving. At no point in his notice does he actually refute the content of the article, he just cries about how Media Matters is being mean to him.

originally posted by: CataclysmicRockets
If you can't handle the heat stay out of the Kitchen, never understood the concept of antisemitism? If I dare say Whiteism I am bad now?
Personally I do not like any 'Ism' to be honest, it's not American and rubs my rhubarb in the wrong way.

It's too easy of an ad hominem.

It's the most simple ad hominem and it's had an overwhelming effect ever since Israel began doing things which inspire protest.

Still, the twitter text would have been less vague than "some Jewish communities" and instead used the term Zionist.

I know, it's a "ist" term, but it would be accurate and also exclude all the free thinking Jewish people who aren't brainwashed by rhetoric of media and the pulpit into believing the Jewish people historically deserve the lands of Israel by any means necessary, because they are God's chosen people.

a reply to: drongosdoomwing


"Did you just say you don't want War on Terror 2.0? You're a NAZI!"

That's indeed the intended programming.

You've got it!

originally posted by: Threadbarer
Musk is more saying that he's going to sue Media Matters for posting the article that led to all of these advertisers leaving. At no point in his notice does he actually refute the content of the article, he just cries about how Media Matters is being mean to him.

Media Matters replied to his threat:

Far from the free speech advocate he claims to be, Musk is a bully who threatens meritless lawsuits in an attempt to silence reporting that he even confirmed is accurate. Musk admitted the ads at issue ran alongside the pro-Nazi content we identified. If he does sue us, we will win.

Musk actually admitted there were Nazi ads posted next to other ads, and said they would not be removed but would be demonetized. So he actually confirmed the reporting was right.

He's just not a very smart man.

originally posted by: Threadbarer
Musk is more saying that he's going to sue Media Matters for posting the article that led to all of these advertisers leaving. At no point in his notice does he actually refute the content of the article, he just cries about how Media Matters is being mean to him.

Nice spin, but incorrect.

Media Matters for America (MMFA) published a report last week showing ads for mainstream brands on X, formerly Twitter, were running alongside user posts espousing pro-Nazi views.
A spokesperson for X, Joe Benarroch, emailed a company blog post to CNBC that alleges Media Matters has "completely misrepresented the real user experience" of the social network.

"Media Matters created an alternate X account and deliberately followed sensitive accounts to curate posts and get advertising to appear on the account's timeline to then misinform advertisers about the placement of their posts. These contrived experiences could be created on any social media platform."

Typical misinformation by media matters.
The discovery phase can’t come soon enough.👍

a reply to: Mahogani
Musk actually admitted there were Nazi ads posted next to other ads, and said they would not be removed but would be demonetized. So he actually confirmed the reporting was right.

Musk did not admit there were nazi ads.
There were no Nazi ads.
Get your facts straight before posting that garbage.

a reply to: JinMI

Danke!

The thermonuclear lawsuit dropped today as promised.

The suit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas Fort Worth Division, alleges Media Matters' actions were "manipulative and deceptive."

X alleged that Media Matters "exploited" the platform have ads appear this way, which included "excessive scrolling" and curating its feed with "fringe" content.

"The overall effect on advertisers and users was to create the false, misleading perception that these types of pairings were common, widespread, and alarming," the lawsuit reads.

Journalist Michael Shellenberger said he tried to replicate what Media Matters allegedly said they did to get the results, but he wasn't able to. Musk termed the organization "evil."
redstate.com... 13

The Texas AG is going for them and the Missouri AG is looking at it.
Musk and X with immense resources versus media matters, who will have backing from every major media outlet, their political cronies, big corpo and blue state/fed government hacks.
Ali vs Foreman?
Hopefully media matters finally gets throttled for their slimy subterfuge.